Rembert v. Catholic Community Services of Western Washington, et al.
| BRENDA MARIE REMBERT and Brenda M. Johnson |
| CATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES OF WESTERN WASHINGTON, NICK LIEDER, Director, Catholic Community Services, NATIVITY HOUSE, FAATIMA LAWRENCE, Manager, Catholic Community Services, ANISHA FERNANDO, Manager, Catholic Community Services, HAZEL WINNER, MELISSA MOSS, Director, MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBERTSONS COMPANIES, INC., PAUL FERNANDEZ, KRIS BAUER, United Food and Commercial Workers Local 367, SHIMMICK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., ELECTRONIC TRANSACTION CONSULTANTS, LLC, CINDY ROBERSON, TERRY LEE REMBERT, WALMART INC., BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, SAFEWAY, INC., WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, PIONEER HUMAN SERVICES, COUNTY OF PIERCE, TACOMA POLICE DEPARTMENT, EMERALD QUEEN CASINO AND HOTEL, INGRID MCLEOD, ROBYN LINDSEY and BRYAN E. CHUSHCOFF |
| 25-5417 |
| August 26, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 15, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Appellant Brenda Marie Rembert. [Entered: 10/20/2025 12:38 PM] |
| Filing 4 Miscellaneous Pro Se Filings Filed [Entered: 10/08/2025 02:49 PM] |
Filing 3
ORDER FILED. It appears that this appeal may be frivolous. If the appeal is frivolous, the court will revoke appellants in forma pauperis status and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days, appellant must: (1) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous and a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, OR (2) file a motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). If appellant files a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous, or any other response other than a motion to dismiss, the court will determine whether the appeal is frivolous. If it is frivolous, the appeal will be dismissed. If it is not frivolous, the appeal will proceed. Briefing is stayed. If appellant does not respond to this order, the court may dismiss this appeal without further notice. The clerk will serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward, and (3) a Form 4 financial affidavit. [Entered: 09/29/2025 03:48 PM]
|
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 10/8/2025, Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 11/10/2025. For appeal no. 25-5417, 3:19-cv-05316-BHS. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 08/26/2025 02:01 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 3:19-cv-05316-BHS has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-5417 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 08/26/2025 01:58 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
