Walton, et al. v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California, San Francisco
| DENISHA M. WALTON and JUSTIN WALTON |
| UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO |
| KEE ANA SMITH, WENDY LEE LOWINGER, MAMIE WONG, DONITA CARTER, ALEXIS STUCKEY, JULIA EYCK, DAN KELLY, CANDICE SAADIAN COSTA, CLAUDIA SAGASTUME, CITY OF TRACY, AMY STOLL, ANNA M. SABIO, JOSEPH R. BIDEN, KAMALA HARRIS, MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL, XAVIER BECERRA, CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, KATYA CORNEJO, MARGARET ANN PENDERGAST, TRENT RHORER, MARIA SU, RYAN SHEETS, Dad's Attorney, GAVIN NEWSOM, GOVERNOR OF CALIFORNIA, ROB BONTA and STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA |
| 25-5506 |
| August 29, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 25, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER FILED. R. NELSON, SUNG, and H.A. THOMAS, Circuit Judges. Petitioners have not demonstrated a clear and indisputable right to the extraordinary remedy of mandamus. See In re Mersho, 6 F.4th 891, 897 (9th Cir. 2021) (To determine whether a writ of mandamus should be granted, we weigh the five factors outlined in Bauman v. United States District Court.); Bauman v. U.S. Dist. Court, 557 F.2d 650 (9th Cir. 1977). The petition is denied. All pending motions are denied as moot. 2 25-5506 No further filings will be entertained in this closed case. DENIED. [Entered: 09/25/2025 04:40 PM]
|
| Filing 6 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Petitioner Denisha M. Walton. [Entered: 09/11/2025 12:18 PM] |
| Filing 5 SUPPLEMENTto Motion filed by Petitioner Denisha M. Walton. [Entered: 09/11/2025 12:14 PM] |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Petitioner Denisha M. Walton. [Entered: 09/03/2025 09:56 AM] |
| Filing 3 SCHEDULE NOTICE for Petition for a Writ of Mandamus and-or Prohibition. [Entered: 08/29/2025 02:16 PM] |
| Filing 2 CASE OPENED. Your case opening documents have been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 8/29/2025. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-5506 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for assistance. [Entered: 08/29/2025 02:13 PM] |
| Filing 1 PETITION for a Writ of Mandamus and/or Prohibition filed by Petitioner Denisha M. Walton, Petitioner Justin Walton. [Entered: 08/29/2025 02:12 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.