Quintana v. Lermond Psy, D, et al.
| PAUL NAVARRETE QUINTANA |
| CYNTHIA E. LERMOND PSY, D, official and individual capacity, NICOLE PAGLIONE, PSY, D., official and individual capacity, MELINDA WOLBRANSKY, PSY, D., official and individual capacity, DAE PETER LEE, PSY, D, official and individual capacity, RAE M. HUEBNER, PSY, D., official and individual capacity, ASHLEY CABADAS, PSY, D., official and individual capacity, LISA REAL, PSY, D., official and individual capacity, KIMBERLY CLABBET, PSY, D., official and individual capacity, MEREDITH MICHAELS, PSY, D., official and individual capacity, JOHNNY JELHAOULI, LCSW, official and individual capacity, MELISA JONES PSY, D, official and individual capacity, KERMEILA DESAI, official and individual capacity, GOLDEN LEGACY CARE CENTER, GATEWAYS HOSPITAL AND MENTAL HEALTH CENTERS, Conditional Outpatient; FCTP-Gateway-Conplep; FCTP-Forensic Community; Gateways Satellite Program; official capacity, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF STATE HOSPITALS, Department of State Hospital-Los Angeles official capacity and MHM SERVICES OF CALIFORNIA, official capacity |
| 25-5643 |
| September 5, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 7, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 MOTION for Miscellaneous Relief filed by Appellant Paul Navarrete Quintana. [Case dismissed] [Entered: 10/07/2025 02:35 PM] |
Filing 10
ORDER FILED. (Ryan D. NELSON, Jennifer SUNG, Holly A. THOMAS) The notice of appeal was delivered to prison officials more than 180 days after the district court entered a final order on November 25, 2024. See 28 U.S.C. 2107(a); United States v. Sadler, 480 F.3d 932, 937 (9th Cir. 2007) (requirement of timely notice of appeal is jurisdictional); see also Stratton v. Buck, 697 F.3d 1004, 1007 (9th Cir. 2012) (Where there is no separate judgment, pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(7)(A)(ii), we deem the entry of judgment to be 150 days after the entry of an appealable final order.). This appeal is therefore dismissed. All pending motions are denied as moot. DISMISSED. [Entered: 10/01/2025 03:28 PM]
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER FILED. Paper Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief (DE 8) denied as unnecessary. It is unnecessary. The briefing schedule is stayed. Briefing shall be reset as necessary pending resolution of the motion to appoint counsel (DE4). [Entered: 09/24/2025 11:36 AM]
|
| Filing 8 STREAMLINED request for extension of time to file brief for 30 days filed by Appellant Paul Navarrete Quintana. [Entered: 09/23/2025 03:28 PM] |
| Filing 7 DOCUMENT SENT. Sent Appellant a copy of the FRAP and Ninth Circuit rules per the Form 29 request filed on 09/23/2025. [Entered: 09/23/2025 11:56 AM] |
| Filing 6 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Appellant Paul Navarrete Quintana. [Entered: 09/23/2025 11:30 AM] |
| Filing 5 REQUEST for Public Information filed by Appellant Paul Navarrete Quintana. [Entered: 09/23/2025 11:29 AM] |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel filed by Appellant Paul Navarrete Quintana. [Entered: 09/23/2025 11:26 AM] |
| Filing 3 CORRESPONDENCE filed by Appellant Paul Navarrete Quintana. [Entered: 09/23/2025 11:21 AM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 10/15/2025. For appeal no. 25-5643, 2:24-cv-03524-WLH-PD. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 09/05/2025 02:33 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:24-cv-03524-WLH-PD has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-5643 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 09/05/2025 02:29 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
