Luehring v. Lee, et al.
| FREDERICK LUEHRING, III |
| EUNMEE LEE, DOES, MAYBELL MANLAGNIT, EDDIE PARKS and CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF STATE HOSPITALS - METROPOLITAN |
| 25-5678 |
| September 8, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Prisoner-Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 29, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 MANDATE ISSUED Ryan D. NELSON, Jennifer SUNG, Holly A. THOMAS. The judgment of this Court, entered 9/26/2025, takes effect this date. [Entered: 01/29/2026 08:52 AM] |
Filing 10
ORDER FILED. Ryan D. NELSON, Jennifer SUNG, Holly A. THOMAS The motion (Docket Entry No. 9) to reconsider or to stay the September 26, 2025 dismissal order is denied. See 9th Cir. R. 27-10. No further filings will be entertained in this closed case. [Entered: 01/21/2026 10:12 AM]
|
| Filing 9 MOTION to Reconsider Dispositive Order filed by Appellant Frederick Luehring. [COURT ENTERED FILING to correct DE 8.] [Entered: 09/29/2025 07:48 AM] |
| Filing 8 DEFECTIVE---MOTION to Reconsider Nondispositive Order filed by Appellant Frederick Luehring. [Wrong filing type used, correct entry is DE 9.] [Entered: 09/27/2025 03:22 PM] [Edited: 09/29/2025 07:49 AM] |
|
Filing 7
ORDER FILED. (Ryan D. NELSON, Jennifer SUNG, Holly A. THOMAS) A district courts dismissal order is not final or immediately appealable under 28 U.S.C. 1291 unless it disposes of all claims as to all parties or unless judgment is entered in compliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b). Romoland Sch. Dist. v. Inland Empire Energy Ctr., LLC, 548 F.3d 738, 747 (9th Cir. 2008) (citing Chacon v. Babcock, 640 F.2d 221, 222 (9th Cir. 1981)); see also 28 U.S.C. 1291; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b). This court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the August 28, 2025 order did not dispose of all claims as to all parties. This appeal is therefore dismissed. See 9th Cir. R. 3-6(b) (if court determines it lacks jurisdiction, court may dismiss appeal without notice or further proceedings). All pending motions are denied as moot. DISMISSED. [Entered: 09/26/2025 12:08 PM]
|
| Filing 6 SUPPLEMENT to Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (DE 3) filed by Appellant Frederick Luehring. [Entered: 09/25/2025 04:52 PM] [Edited: 09/29/2025 07:49 AM] |
| Filing 5 SUPPLEMENT to Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (DE 3) filed by Appellant Frederick Luehring. [Entered: 09/10/2025 04:58 PM] |
| Filing 4 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Frederick Luehring. [Entered: 09/10/2025 04:49 PM] |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Appellant Frederick Luehring. [Entered: 09/09/2025 02:54 PM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 10/20/2025, Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 11/20/2025. For appeal no. 25-5678, 2:21-cv-03879-GW-SK. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 09/08/2025 02:49 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:21-cv-03879-GW-SK has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-5678 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 09/08/2025 01:56 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
