Harris v. Cluff, et al.
| STEVEN L. HARRIS |
| BENJAMIN J. CLUFF, District Court Judge for the Twin Falls County State of Idaho, GRANT P. LOBES, Prosecuting Attorney for the Twin Falls County State of Idaho, SEAN WYNN, Public Defender for the Twin Falls County State of Idaho, MATTHEW GONZALES, Deputy Sheriff for the Twin Falls County State of Idaho and BENJAMIN ANDERSEN, Chief Public Defender for the Twin Falls State of Idaho |
| 25-5703 |
| September 9, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 23, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 MANDATE ISSUED Ryan D. NELSON, Jennifer SUNG, Holly A. THOMAS. The judgment of this Court, entered 10/1/2025, takes effect this date. [Entered: 10/23/2025 08:43 AM] |
Filing 7
ORDER FILED. (Ryan D. NELSON, Jennifer SUNG, Holly A. THOMAS) The notice of appeal was not delivered to prison officials within 30 days after the district court entered the judgment on June 4, 2025. See 28 U.S.C. 2107(a); United States v. Sadler, 480 F.3d 932, 937 (9th Cir. 2007) (requirement of timely notice of appeal is jurisdictional); see also Fed. R. App. P. 4(c)(1) (notice of appeal deemed filed when deposited in the institutions internal mail system if appellant submits sufficient evidence); Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 270 (1988). This appeal is therefore dismissed. All pending motions are denied as moot. DISMISSED. [Entered: 10/01/2025 04:18 PM]
|
| Filing 6 CLERK ACTION: Opening Brief submitted at DE 5 by Appellant Steven L. Harris is filed. Original and 0 copies. (briefing remains stayed, motions pending) [Entered: 09/22/2025 01:43 PM] |
| Filing 5 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Steven L. Harris. [Entered: 09/22/2025 01:42 PM] |
| Filing 4 CJA FORM 23 FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT filed by Appellant Steven L. Harris. [Entered: 09/22/2025 01:34 PM] |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel filed by Appellant Steven L. Harris. [Entered: 09/22/2025 01:33 PM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 10/20/2025. For appeal no. 25-5703, 1:25-cv-00072-AKB. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 09/09/2025 02:04 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 1:25-cv-00072-AKB has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-5703 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 09/09/2025 01:57 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Harris v. Cluff, et al. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: STEVEN L. HARRIS | |
| Represented By: | Steven L. Harris |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: BENJAMIN J. CLUFF, District Court Judge for the Twin Falls County State of Idaho | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: GRANT P. LOBES, Prosecuting Attorney for the Twin Falls County State of Idaho | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: SEAN WYNN, Public Defender for the Twin Falls County State of Idaho | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: MATTHEW GONZALES, Deputy Sheriff for the Twin Falls County State of Idaho | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: BENJAMIN ANDERSEN, Chief Public Defender for the Twin Falls State of Idaho | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
