Banks, et al. v. R.C. Bigelow, Inc., et al.
Plaintiff: KIMBERLY BANKS, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and CAROL CANTWELL, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Defendant: R.C. BIGELOW, INC., a corporation and DOES, 1 through 10, inclusive
Case Number: 25-5911
Filed: September 19, 2025
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 4, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 4, 2026 Filing 21 EXCERPTS OF RECORD Volumes 10 & 11 UNDER SEAL submitted for filing by Appellant R.C. Bigelow, Inc. (Court entered filing of sealed vols submitted at DE 18) [Entered: 03/05/2026 10:17 AM]
March 4, 2026 Filing 20 OPENING BRIEF UNDER SEAL submitted for filing by Appellant R.C. Bigelow, Inc. (Court entered filing of sealed brief submitted at DE 18) [Entered: 03/05/2026 10:14 AM]
March 4, 2026 Filing 19 EXCERPTS OF RECORD submitted for filing by Appellant R.C. Bigelow, Inc.. [Entered: 03/04/2026 04:59 PM]
March 4, 2026 Filing 18 MOTION to File Document Under Seal and Sealed Document Submitted for Filing filed by Appellant R.C. Bigelow, Inc.. [Entered: 03/04/2026 04:22 PM]
March 2, 2026 Filing 17 REPLY to Response to Motion to Dismiss (DE 16) filed by Appellee Kimberly Banks, Appellee Carol Cantwell. [Entered: 03/02/2026 05:51 AM]
February 27, 2026 Filing 16 RESPONSE to Motion to Dismiss (DE 14) filed by Appellant R.C. Bigelow, Inc.. [Entered: 02/27/2026 11:05 AM]
February 26, 2026 Filing 15 RESPONSE to Motion to Extend Time to File Brief (DE 13) filed by Appellee Kimberly Banks, Appellee Carol Cantwell. [Entered: 02/26/2026 09:13 AM]
February 25, 2026 Filing 14 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Appellee Kimberly Banks, Appellee Carol Cantwell. [Entered: 02/25/2026 01:55 PM]
February 17, 2026 Filing 13 MOTION to Extend Time to File Brief filed by Appellant R.C. Bigelow, Inc.. [Entered: 02/17/2026 02:57 PM]
January 30, 2026 Filing 12 TEXT ORDER FILED. The motion (Docket Entry No. 11) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. The opening brief is due February 24, 2026.The answering brief is due March 26, 2026.The optional reply brief is due 21 days after the answering brief is served. [Entered: 01/30/2026 04:39 PM]
January 27, 2026 Filing 11 MOTION to Extend Time to File Brief filed by Appellant R.C. Bigelow, Inc.. [Entered: 01/27/2026 03:30 PM]
December 17, 2025 Filing 10 TEXT ORDER FILED. The motion (Docket Entry No. 9) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. The opening brief is due February 9, 2026.The answering brief is due March 11, 2026.The optional reply brief is due 21 days after the answering brief is served. [Entered: 12/17/2025 04:15 PM]
December 4, 2025 Filing 9 MOTION to Extend Time to File Brief filed by Appellant R.C. Bigelow, Inc.. [Entered: 12/04/2025 04:36 PM]
October 2, 2025 Filing 8 RELEASED FROM MEDIATION (text only). This case is released from the Mediation Program. [Entered: 10/02/2025 03:39 PM]
September 30, 2025 Filing 7 ADDED Counsel for Appellant Tara N. Swanson [Entered: 09/30/2025 02:04 PM]
September 30, 2025 Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Tara N. Swanson for Appellant R.C. Bigelow, Inc.. [Entered: 09/30/2025 01:52 PM]
September 30, 2025 Filing 5 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Appellant R.C. Bigelow, Inc.. [Entered: 09/30/2025 09:42 AM]
September 25, 2025 Filing 4 MEDIATION ORDER: By 10/2/2025, counsel to email Circuit Mediator regarding settlement potential. Include Ninth Circuit case name and number in subject line. This communication will be kept confidential, if requested, and should not be filed with the court. The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. [Entered: 09/25/2025 01:54 PM]
September 24, 2025 Filing 3 MEDIATION QUESTIONNAIRE filed by Appellant R.C. Bigelow, Inc.. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please email #[email protected] and include the case name and number in the subject line. Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts. [Entered: 09/24/2025 05:31 PM]
September 19, 2025 Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Mediation Questionnaire due (Appellant) 9/24/2025, Appeal Transcript Order Due (Appellant) 10/2/2025, Appeal Transcript Due (Appellant) 11/3/2025, Appeal Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 12/11/2025, Appeal Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 1/12/2026. For appeal no. 25-5911, 2:20-cv-06208-SVW-RAO. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 09/19/2025 12:05 PM]
September 19, 2025 Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:20-cv-06208-SVW-RAO has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-5911 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 09/19/2025 12:03 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Banks, et al. v. R.C. Bigelow, Inc., et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: KIMBERLY BANKS, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Represented By: Todd M. Schneider
Represented By: Jason H. Kim
Represented By: Mr. Aubry Wand
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CAROL CANTWELL, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Represented By: Todd M. Schneider
Represented By: Jason H. Kim
Represented By: Mr. Aubry Wand
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: R.C. BIGELOW, INC., a corporation
Represented By: Mr. Matthew G. Kleiner
Represented By: Mr. Timothy K Branson
Represented By: Patrick Mulkern
Represented By: Tara N. Swanson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DOES, 1 through 10, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?