King v. Tarver, et al.
| TED ARTHUR KING |
| RUSSELL LEE TARVER, KURT ALAN TARVER, LEANNE GARCIA, Sac Sheriff, SANTIAGO JAMES GARCIA, Sac Sheriff, VIRGINIA EILEEN TARVER, SACRAMENTO COUNTY and COUNTY OF PLACER |
| 25-5913 |
| September 19, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Fraud |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 17, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 MANDATE ISSUED Barry G. SILVERMAN, Richard A. PAEZ, Holly A. THOMAS. The judgment of this Court, entered 1/26/2026, takes effect this date. [Entered: 02/17/2026 08:14 AM] |
Filing 15
ORDER FILED. (Barry G. SILVERMAN, Richard A. PAEZ, Holly A. THOMAS) After considering the response to the courts November 6, 2025 order and the amended opening brief, we deny the motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Docket Entry No. 4) and dismiss this appeal as frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a), (e)(2). No further filings will be entertained in this closed case. DISMISSED. [Entered: 01/26/2026 11:28 AM]
|
| Filing 14 RESPONSE to Reply to Response to Court Order (DE 13) filed by Appellant Ted Arthur King. [Entered: 12/18/2025 01:39 PM] |
| Filing 13 REPLY to Response to Court Order (DE 11) filed by Appellee Santiago James Garcia, Appellee Sacramento County. [Court entered filing to correct DE 12] [Entered: 12/09/2025 01:50 PM] |
| Filing 12 DEFECTIVE---RESPONSE to Order - Order to Show Cause (OSC) (DE 7) filed by Appellee Santiago James Garcia, Appellee Sacramento County. [Wrong filing type, corrected in DE 13] [Entered: 12/09/2025 01:23 PM] [Edited: 12/09/2025 01:50 PM] |
| Filing 11 RESPONSE to Order - Order to Show Cause (OSC) (DE 7) filed by Appellant Ted Arthur King. [Entered: 12/08/2025 04:53 PM] |
| Filing 10 CLERK ACTION: Amended Opening Brief submitted at DE 9 by Appellant Ted Arthur King is filed. Original and 3 copies. Filed with minor deficiency: not accompanied by motion to file amended (replacement) brief. (Briefing remains stayed) [Entered: 11/26/2025 12:35 PM] |
| Filing 9 AMENDED OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Ted Arthur King. [Entered: 11/26/2025 12:23 PM] |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of change of address filed by Appellant Ted Arthur King. [Entered: 11/18/2025 03:32 PM] |
|
Filing 7
ORDER FILED. It appears that this appeal may be frivolous. If the appeal is frivolous, the court will deny permission to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days, appellant must: (1) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous, OR (2) file a motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). If appellant files a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous, or any other response other than a motion to dismiss, the court will determine whether the appeal is frivolous. If it is frivolous, the appeal will be dismissed. If it is not frivolous, the appeal will proceed. If appellant files a statement that the appeal should go forward, appellees may file a response within 10 days after service of appellants statement. Briefing is stayed. If appellant does not respond to this order, the court may dismiss this appeal without further notice. The clerk will serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, and (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward. [Entered: 11/06/2025 05:48 PM]
|
| Filing 6 CLERK ACTION: Opening Brief submitted at DE 5 by Appellant Ted Arthur King is filed. Original and 0 copies. (motion for IFP pending, briefing remains stayed) [Entered: 10/31/2025 12:27 PM] |
| Filing 5 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Ted Arthur King. [Entered: 10/31/2025 12:26 PM] |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Appellant Ted Arthur King. [Entered: 10/31/2025 11:32 AM] |
|
Filing 3
ORDER FILED. . Response to Fee Order due (Appellant) 11/20/2025 [Entered: 10/23/2025 03:05 PM]
|
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 10/29/2025, Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 11/28/2025. For appeal no. 25-5913, 2:24-cv-03757-DAD-CSK. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 09/19/2025 01:25 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:24-cv-03757-DAD-CSK has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-5913 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 09/19/2025 01:22 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
