United States of America v. Jund
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: DAVID JUND
Case Number: 25-5917
Filed: September 19, 2025
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 20, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 20, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER FILED. (TEXT ONLY) The motion (Docket Entry No. 13) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. The opening brief is due March 27, 2026. The answering brief is due April 27, 2026. The optional reply brief is due 21 days after the answering brief is served. [Entered: 02/20/2026 02:43 PM]
February 17, 2026 Filing 13 MOTION to Extend Time to File Brief filed by Appellant David Jund. [Entered: 02/17/2026 07:47 PM]
January 20, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief (DE 11) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 2/25/2026, Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 3/27/2026. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 01/20/2026 08:46 AM]
January 20, 2026 Filing 11 Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief filed by Appellant David Jund. [Entered: 01/20/2026 05:47 AM]
November 25, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER FILED. The stay of briefing is lifted. The opening brief is due January 26, 2026. The answering brief is due February 25, 2026. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 11/25/2025 02:38 PM]
November 20, 2025 Filing 9 Criminal Appeals Questionnaire filed by Appellant David Jund [Entered: 11/20/2025 10:16 PM]
November 18, 2025 Filing 8 TEXT ONLY ORDER: On November 13, 2025, the court issued a global order resetting the non-jurisdictional filing deadlines for federally funded attorneys (including FPDs and CJA counsel), that had been stayed by the courts October 1, 2025 Supplemental Administrative Order. If your deadlines were suspended by the October 1 Administrative Order, please review the #Order Resetting Deadlines, available on the courts website, to find your new deadlines. [Entered: 11/18/2025 06:54 PM]
November 17, 2025 Filing 7 ADDED Counsel for Appellant Brad Kannof Kaiserman [Entered: 11/17/2025 02:54 PM]
November 17, 2025 Filing 6 CJA Counsel Appointment [Entered: 11/17/2025 02:52 PM]
October 28, 2025 Filing 5 TERMINATED participation of Counsel for Appellant Kristen Nicole Richards, representing Appellant David Jund. [Entered: 10/28/2025 04:08 PM]
October 28, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER FILED. Lisa B. Fitzgerald, Appellate Commissioner. The motion (Docket Entry No. 3) by Kristen N. Richards to withdraw and to appoint new counsel is granted. See 18 U.S.C. 3006A. Within 14 days of identifying counsel, the appointing authority for the Central District of California is requested to send counsels contact information to [email protected]. The briefing schedule is stayed and will be reset in a future order. The clerk will serve this order on former counsel and appellant individually. [Entered: 10/28/2025 04:04 PM]
September 24, 2025 Filing 3 MOTION to Withdraw as Counsel filed by Kristen Nicole Richards for Appellant David Jund. [Entered: 09/24/2025 11:05 AM]
September 19, 2025 Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Sentence Imposed: 63 Months. Appeal Transcript Order Due (Appellant) 10/3/2025, Appeal Transcript Due (Appellant) 11/3/2025, Appeal Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 12/12/2025, Appeal Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 1/12/2026. For appeal no. 25-5917, 2:24-cr-00481-SVW-1. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule may result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1 [Entered: 09/19/2025 02:17 PM]
September 19, 2025 Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:24-cr-00481-SVW-1 has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-5917 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 09/19/2025 02:15 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: United States of America v. Jund
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Criminal Appeals USAO C.D.C.A., Appellate Criminal Chief
Represented By: Matthew Tako
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DAVID JUND
Represented By: Ms. Kristen Nicole Richards
Represented By: Brad Kannof Kaiserman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?