Limpin v. DOJ - Office of the United States Attorney - Southern District of California, et al.
| MELCHOR KARL T. LIMPIN |
| DOJ - OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY - SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and DOJ - OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY - SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, Civil Division |
| 25-5920 |
| September 19, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 14, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 On November 13, 2025, the court issued a global order resetting the non-jurisdictional filing deadlines for federally funded attorneys (including FPDs and CJA counsel), that had been stayed by the courts October 1, 2025 Supplemental Administrative Order. If your deadlines were suspended by the October 1 Administrative Order, please review the #Order Resetting Deadlines, available on the courts website, to find your new deadlines. [Entered: 11/14/2025 05:04 PM] |
| Filing 7 CLERK ACTION: Opening Brief submitted at DE 6 by Appellant Melchor Karl T. Limpin is filed. Original and 0 copies. [Entered: 10/22/2025 02:43 PM] |
| Filing 6 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Melchor Karl T. Limpin. [Entered: 10/22/2025 02:35 PM] |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Appellant Melchor Karl T. Limpin. [Entered: 10/02/2025 03:32 PM] |
| Filing 4 RESPONSE to Order - Order to Show Cause (OSC) (DE 3) filed by Appellant Melchor Karl T. Limpin. [Entered: 10/02/2025 03:30 PM] |
Filing 3
ORDER FILED. The district court denied appellant leave to proceed in forma pauperis because it found that the action was frivolous. Within 35 days, appellant must: (1) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous and a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, OR (2) file a motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). If appellant files a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous, or any other response other than a motion to dismiss, the court will determine whether the appeal is frivolous. If it is frivolous, the appeal will be dismissed. If it is not frivolous, the appeal will proceed. Briefing is stayed. If appellant does not respond to this order, the court may dismiss this appeal without further notice. The clerk will serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward, and (3) a Form 4 financial affidavit. [Entered: 09/22/2025 01:11 PM]
|
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 10/29/2025. For appeal no. 25-5920, 3:25-cv-02162-RSH-MSB. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 09/19/2025 03:14 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 3:25-cv-02162-RSH-MSB has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-5920 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 09/19/2025 03:07 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Limpin v. DOJ - Office of the United States Attorney - Southern District of California, et al. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: MELCHOR KARL T. LIMPIN | |
| Represented By: | Melchor Karl T. Limpin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: DOJ - OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY - SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: DOJ - OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY - SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, Civil Division | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
