Moore v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California, San Francisco
| JERRY MOORE |
| UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO |
| JACKSON FAMILY FARMS, LLC |
| 25-5970 |
| September 23, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 24, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 FEE PAID by Appellant, cashier's check 0064808851 for $600.00. Receipt No. 100000600 [COURT UPDATE: Adding Court Receipt Number] [Entered: 09/24/2025 01:04 PM] [Edited: 10/01/2025 02:54 PM] |
Filing 5
ORDER FILED. (Ryan D. NELSON, Jennifer SUNG, Holly A. THOMAS) Petitioner has not demonstrated a clear and indisputable right to the extraordinary remedy of mandamus. See In re Mersho, 6 F.4th 891, 897 (9th Cir. 2021) (To determine whether a writ of mandamus should be granted, we weigh the five factors outlined in Bauman v. United States District Court.); Bauman v. U.S. Dist. Court, 557 F.2d 650 (9th Cir. 1977). The petition is denied. The motion for a stay, included in the petition, is denied as moot. DENIED. [Entered: 09/24/2025 11:24 AM]
|
| Filing 4 SCHEDULE NOTICE for Petition for a Writ of Mandamus and-or Prohibition. [Entered: 09/23/2025 10:06 AM] |
| Filing 3 CASE OPENED. Your case opening documents have been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 9/22/2025. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-5970 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for assistance. [Entered: 09/23/2025 10:04 AM] |
| Filing 2 EXHIBITS to Petition for a Writ of Mandamus and-or Prohibition filed by Petitioner Jerry Moore. [Entered: 09/23/2025 10:02 AM] |
| Filing 1 PETITION for a Writ of Mandamus and/or Prohibition filed by Petitioner Jerry Moore. [Entered: 09/23/2025 10:02 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Moore v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California, San Francisco | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: JERRY MOORE | |
| Represented By: | Eric B. Alspaugh |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Real party in interest: JACKSON FAMILY FARMS, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Allison Berk |
| Represented By: | Joy L. Durand |
| Represented By: | J. Scott Gerien |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
