Scottsdale Insurance Company v. Yazdi, et al.
| SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY |
| SHAHIN YAZDI, JS UNION, LLC, DOES 1-50, LOCALI MANAGEMENT GROUP, LLC and CASHIO PROPERTIES |
| 25-6002 |
| September 23, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Insurance |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 4, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 MEDIATION ORDER (text only): The court has been informed that the parties require additional time to file a motion or stipulation to dismiss this appeal. By 5/4/2026, appellant shall file a motion or stipulation to dismiss this matter or shall contact the Circuit Mediator. [25-5713, 25-6002] [Entered: 03/04/2026 06:43 PM] |
| Filing 12 CORRESPONDENCE filed by Appellant Scottsdale Insurance Company. [25-5713, 25-6002] [Court entered filing to correct DE 16] [Entered: 02/27/2026 04:47 PM] |
| Filing 11 DEFECTIVE---STATUS REPORT filed by Appellant Scottsdale Insurance Company. [25-5713, 25-6002] [Wrong filing type, corrected in DE 17] [Entered: 02/27/2026 04:34 PM] [Edited: 02/27/2026 04:48 PM] |
| Filing 10 MEDIATION ORDER (text only): Appellant has failed to file a motion or stipulation to dismiss as required by the court's order. By 3/5/2026, appellant shall file such a motion or stipulation or show cause in writing why this case should not be deemed to be dismissed voluntarily under Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). Failure to comply with this order will be deemed a request for voluntary dismissal, and a dismissal order will be entered by the court. [25-5713, 25-6002] [Entered: 02/19/2026 02:40 PM] |
| Filing 9 MEDIATION ORDER (text only): Mediation Dismissal Due (Appellant) 2/17/2026. Appellant shall file either a motion or a stipulation to dismiss this matter pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), or shall contact the Circuit Mediator. The briefing schedule previously set by the court is vacated. [25-5713, 25-6002] [Entered: 12/17/2025 12:59 PM] |
| Filing 8 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED (text only) - DIAL-IN Mediation Conference Call with counsel for Scottsdale Insurance Company only, 12/9/2025, 3:00 pm Pacific Time. Each participant will receive an email with dial-in instructions. [25-5713, 25-6002] [Entered: 11/25/2025 11:43 AM] |
| Filing 7 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED (text only) - DIAL-IN , with counsel for Scottsdale Insurance Company only, 3:00 pm Pacific Time. Each participant will receive an email with dial-in instructions. [25-5713, 25-6002] [Entered: 11/17/2025 03:22 PM] |
| Filing 6 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED (text only) - DIAL-IN Mediation Conference Call 11/17/2025, 10:30 am Pacific Time. Each participant will receive an email with dial-in instructions. [25-5713, 25-6002] [Entered: 10/20/2025 11:20 AM] |
| Filing 5 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED (text only) - DIAL-IN Mediation Conference Call 10/20/2025, 10:00 am Pacific Time. Each participant will receive an email with dial-in instructions. The briefing schedule previously set by the court is amended as follows: the first brief on cross-appeal is due January 26, 2025; the second brief on cross-appeal is due February 26, 2025; the third brief on cross-appeal is due March 30, 2025; the optional cross-appeal reply brief is due within 21 days from the service date of the third cross-appeal brief. [25-5713, 25-6002] [Entered: 10/09/2025 12:31 PM] |
| Filing 4 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Appellant JS Union, LLC, Appellant Locali Management Group, LLC. [25-6002, 25-5713] [Entered: 09/27/2025 03:57 PM] |
| Filing 3 MEDIATION QUESTIONNAIRE filed by Appellant Shahin Yazdi, Appellant JS Union, LLC, Appellant Locali Management Group, LLC, Appellant Cashio Properties. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please email #[email protected] and include the case name and number in the subject line. Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts. [25-6002, 25-5713] [Entered: 09/27/2025 03:42 PM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Mediation Questionnaire due (Appellant) 9/29/2025, Cross Appeal First Brief Due (Appellee) 12/1/2025, Cross Appeal Second Brief Due (Appellant) 12/31/2025, Cross Appeal Third Brief Due (Appellee) 2/2/2026. For appeal no. 25-6002, 2:20-cv-08701-SPG-AJR. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1 [25-6002, 25-5713] [Entered: 09/23/2025 03:44 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:20-cv-08701-SPG-AJR has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-6002 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 09/23/2025 03:39 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
