United States of America v. Bond
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: JAMES BOND and Jaymes Christopher Schulte
Case Number: 25-6033
Filed: September 25, 2025
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 21, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 21, 2026 Filing 11 MAIL RETURNED. DE 10 addressed to Appellant James Bond. Action taken: resending to Central Arizona Florence Correctional Complex, P.O. Box 6300, Florence, AZ 85132. [Entered: 01/21/2026 02:23 PM]
January 5, 2026 Filing 10 MANDATE ISSUED Richard R. CLIFTON, Andrew D. HURWITZ, Daniel A. BRESS. The judgment of this Court, entered 12/12/2025, takes effect this date. [Entered: 01/05/2026 10:53 AM]
December 12, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER FILED. (Richard R. CLIFTON, Andrew D. HURWITZ, Daniel A. BRESS) Having reviewed the record and the parties responses to the courts October 30, 2025, order to show cause, we dismiss this appeal as untimely. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(1)(A); United States v. Sadler, 480 F.3d 932, 942 (9th Cir. 2007). DISMISSED. [Entered: 12/12/2025 02:09 PM]
November 25, 2025 Filing 8 REPLY to Response to Court Order (DE 7) filed by Appellee United States of America. [Entered: 11/25/2025 01:15 PM]
November 17, 2025 Filing 7 RESPONSE to Court Order (DE 4) filed by Appellant James Bond. [Entered: 11/18/2025 03:10 PM]
November 5, 2025 Filing 6 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Appellee United States of America. [Entered: 11/05/2025 12:12 PM]
October 30, 2025 Filing 5 TERMINATED participation of Counsel for Appellant Myles A. Schneider, Counsel for Appellant Karina Janine Ordonez, representing Appellant James Bond. [Entered: 10/30/2025 09:55 AM]
October 30, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER FILED. The motion (Docket Entry No. 3) by Miles A. Schneider and Karina J. Ordonez to withdraw as counsel on appeal is granted. See 18 U.S.C. 3006A. The clerk will terminate counsel Schneider and Ordonez from this courts docket. Former counsel is reminded that, in future appeals, a motion to withdraw must be served on appellant, and the proof of service must include appellants current address. See 9th Cir. R. 4-1(c). The notice of appeal was not filed within 14 days after the district court ordered pretrial detention on June 13, 2025. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(1)(A). This appeal therefore appears to be late. Within 21 days, appellant pro se must either file a motion to voluntarily dismiss this appeal or file a statement explaining why it should not be dismissed. If appellant does not do so, the court will dismiss the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. If appellant files a statement, appellee may file a response within 10 days. The motion to appoint substitute counsel will be addressed in a future order if needed. The clerk will serve this order on former counsel. Within 7 days, appellee must serve this order on appellant and provide proof of service to this court, including appellants address and registration number. [Entered: 10/30/2025 09:20 AM]
September 28, 2025 Filing 3 MOTION to Withdraw and for Appointment of New Counsel filed by Appellant James Bond. [Entered: 09/28/2025 01:39 PM]
September 25, 2025 Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. 9(a) Memorandum Due (Appellant) 10/7/2025. Response to Fed. R. App. P. 9(a) memorandum due 10 days after service of the 9(a) memorandum. The optional reply may be filed within 7 days of service of the response. See 9th Cir. R. 9-1.1. Failure of the petitioner to comply with this briefing schedule may result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1 [Entered: 09/25/2025 08:46 AM]
September 25, 2025 Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:23-cr-01238-KML-1 has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-6033 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 09/25/2025 08:43 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: United States of America v. Bond
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JAMES BOND
Represented By: Karina Janine Ordonez
Represented By: Myles A. Schneider
Represented By: James Bond
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jaymes Christopher Schulte
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Ms. Rachel Elizabeth Nava
Represented By: Ms. Sheila Ann Phillips
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?