Singh Randhawa, et al. v. United States Department of Homeland Security, et al.
| VRINDER SINGH RANDHAWA, MANDEEP SANDU RANDHAWA and A.K.R., a minor |
| UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES and TRANSPORTATION SECURITY ADMINISTRATION |
| 25-6048 |
| September 25, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 9, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 MANDATE ISSUED Richard R. CLIFTON, Andrew D. HURWITZ, Daniel A. BRESS. The judgment of this Court, entered 12/18/2025, takes effect this date. [Entered: 02/09/2026 10:27 AM] |
| Filing 9 Miscellaneous pro se filings received from Appellant Vrinder Singh Randhawa. [Entered: 01/22/2026 08:17 AM] |
Filing 8
ORDER FILED. (Richard R. CLIFTON, Andrew D. HURWITZ, Daniel A. BRESS) The motion (Docket Entry No. 6) for voluntary dismissal is granted. See Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). The request to refund the filing fee is denied. This case is dismissed. All pending motions are denied as moot. DISMISSED. [Entered: 12/18/2025 04:06 PM]
|
| Filing 7 MOTION to Extend Time to File Brief filed by Appellee United States Department of Homeland Security, Appellee United States Customs and Border Protection, Appellee United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Appellee Transportation Security Administration. [Entered: 11/21/2025 03:25 PM] |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Voluntarily Dismiss filed by Appellant Vrinder Singh Randhawa. [Entered: 11/17/2025 10:10 AM] |
| Filing 5 On November 13, 2025, the court issued a global order resetting the non-jurisdictional filing deadlines for federally funded attorneys (including FPDs and CJA counsel), that had been stayed by the courts October 1, 2025 Supplemental Administrative Order. If your deadlines were suspended by the October 1 Administrative Order, please review the #Order Resetting Deadlines, available on the courts website, to find your new deadlines. [Entered: 11/14/2025 05:02 PM] |
| Filing 4 CLERK ACTION: Opening Brief submitted at DE 3 by Appellant Vrinder Singh Randhawa is filed. Original and 0 copies. [Entered: 10/22/2025 03:13 PM] |
| Filing 3 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Vrinder Singh Randhawa. [Entered: 10/22/2025 03:12 PM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 11/4/2025, Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 12/4/2025. For appeal no. 25-6048, 2:24-cv-01540-DAD-CSK. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 09/25/2025 02:04 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:24-cv-01540-DAD-CSK has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-6048 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 09/25/2025 02:02 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
