Early Warning Services, LLC v. Johnson, et al.
| BRANDON O'LOUGHLIN and P.A.Z.E. LLC |
| EARLY WARNING SERVICES, LLC and WARREN JOHNSON |
| SARA STADLER |
| 25-6052 |
| September 25, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Trademark |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 23, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 18
ORDER FILED. John B. OWENS, Eric D. MILLER, Patrick J. BUMATAY The motion (Docket Entry Nos. 8 and 9) to file under seal the affidavit in support of the motion to proceed in forma pauperis and supporting exhibits is granted. The motion (Docket Entry No. 8) to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The motion (Docket Entry No. 12) to dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction is denied without prejudice to renewing the arguments in the answering brief. The opening brief is due April 24, 2026. The answering brief is due May 26, 2026. The optional reply brief is due 21 days after the answering brief is served. Appellant is not required to submit excerpts of record. If appellant does not submit excerpts, appellee must submit all documents cited in the pro se opening brief or otherwise required by the rules. See 9th Cir. R. 30-1. (SEE ORDER FOR FULL TEXT) [Entered: 03/23/2026 03:12 PM]
|
| Filing 17 MOTION for Judicial Notice filed by Appellee Early Warning Services, LLC. [Entered: 02/13/2026 11:28 AM] |
| Filing 16 Amended Notice of Appeal Received. [Entered: 02/02/2026 11:11 AM] |
| Filing 15 CITATION of Supplemental Authorities (28j Letter) filed by Appellant Warren Johnson. [Entered: 02/02/2026 08:46 AM] |
| Filing 14 REPLY to Response to Motion to Dismiss (DE 13) filed by Appellee Early Warning Services, LLC. [Entered: 12/23/2025 01:17 PM] |
| Filing 13 RESPONSE to Motion to Dismiss (DE 12) filed by Appellant Warren Johnson. [Entered: 12/17/2025 05:37 AM] |
| Filing 12 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Appellee Early Warning Services, LLC. [Entered: 12/11/2025 01:21 PM] |
| Filing 11 RESPONSE to Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (DE 8) filed by Appellee Early Warning Services, LLC. [Entered: 11/06/2025 09:31 AM] |
| Filing 10 DEFECTIVE --- MOTION to File Document Under Seal and Sealed Document Submitted for Filing filed by Appellant Warren Johnson. (Duplicate entry, correct entry at DE 9) [Entered: 10/28/2025 03:14 PM] [Edited: 10/31/2025 03:07 PM] |
| Filing 9 MOTION to File Document Under Seal and Sealed Document Submitted for Filing filed by Appellant Warren Johnson.--[COURT UPDATE: Corrected PDF of sealed docs attached as of 10/31/2025, REPLACING original attachment, attached motion and certificate of service] [Entered: 10/28/2025 03:11 PM] [Edited: 10/31/2025 03:07 PM] |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Appellant Warren Johnson.--[COURT UPDATE: Attached sealed docs originally submitted at DE 9] [Entered: 10/28/2025 03:10 PM] [Edited: 10/31/2025 03:24 PM] |
|
Filing 7
ORDER FILED. The fees for this appeal are overdue. Within 21 days, appellant must pay $605 to the district court and file proof of payment in this court or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. If appellant does not do so, the court will dismiss this appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. The clerk will serve a copy of Form 4 on appellant. --[COURT UPDATE: Updated docket text to match PDF of order.] [Entered: 10/23/2025 03:00 PM] [Edited: 11/05/2025 10:39 AM]
|
| Filing 6 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Appellee Early Warning Services, LLC. [Entered: 10/09/2025 12:05 PM] |
|
Filing 5
ORDER FILED. Jennifer SUNG, Holly A. THOMAS The motion (Docket Entry No. 4) to stay the district courts September 24, 2025 order is denied. See Nken v. Holder, 556 U.S. 418, 434 (2009) (defining standard for stay pending appeal). No motions for reconsideration, modification or clarification of this denial will be entertained. [Entered: 09/30/2025 12:08 PM]
|
| Filing 4 MOTION to Stay Lower Court or Agency Proceedings/Order/Judgment filed by Appellant Warren Johnson. [Entered: 09/26/2025 09:41 AM] |
| Filing 3 Emergency MOTION Circuit Rule 27-3 Certificate filed by Appellant Warren Johnson. [Entered: 09/26/2025 09:38 AM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Mediation Questionnaire due (Appellant) 9/30/2025, Appeal Transcript Order Due (Appellant) 10/8/2025, Appeal Transcript Due (Appellant) 11/7/2025, Appeal Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 12/17/2025, Appeal Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 1/16/2026. For appeal no. 25-6052, 2:24-cv-01587-SMB. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 09/25/2025 02:50 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:24-cv-01587-SMB has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-6052 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 09/25/2025 02:48 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
