Scott v. Bondi
| LORNE LEROY SCOTT |
| PAMELA BONDI, ATTORNEY GENERAL |
| PUBLIC DEFENDER OFFICES AND IMMIGRANT AND CRIMINAL DEFENSE ADVOCACY ORGANIZATIONS, IN CASE NO. 25-6070 |
| 25-6070 |
| September 26, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 5, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 30 ADDED Amicus Curiae - Pending Public Defender Offices and Immigrant and Criminal Defense Advocacy Organizations, in Case No. 25-6070, with counsel Su Yon Yi. [Entered: 02/05/2026 12:57 PM] |
| Filing 29 AMICUS BRIEF and MOTION for leave to file amicus brief filed by Public Defender Offices and Immigrant and Criminal Defense Advocacy Organizations.--[COURT UPDATE: Updated docket text to correctly identify prospective amici] [Entered: 02/04/2026 09:38 PM] [Edited: 02/05/2026 12:59 PM] |
| Filing 28 Attorney Jesse David Lorenz as Counsel for Respondent substituted for Attorney Christin Whitacre. [Entered: 02/03/2026 03:10 PM] |
| Filing 27 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Jesse David Lorenz for Respondent Pamela Bondi replacing Christin Whitacre. [Entered: 02/03/2026 03:03 PM] |
| Filing 26 CLERK ACTION: Opening Brief submitted at DE 25 by Petitioner Lorne Leroy Scott is filed. No paper copies are required. [Entered: 01/29/2026 04:13 PM] |
| Filing 25 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Petitioner Lorne Leroy Scott.--[COURT UPDATE: Removed duplicate addendum] [Entered: 01/29/2026 01:05 PM] [Edited: 01/29/2026 04:12 PM] |
Filing 24
ORDER FILED. Barry G. SILVERMAN, Holly A. THOMAS The request (included in Docket Entry No. 21) for an expedited ruling is granted. The supplemented motion (Docket Entry Nos. 4, 14) to stay removal is granted. See Nken v. Holder, 556 U.S. 418, 434 (2009); Leiva-Perez v. Holder, 640 F.3d 962, 964-65 (9th Cir. 2011). The stay of removal remains in place until the mandate issues. The opening brief is due March 18, 2026. The answering brief is due April 17, 2026. The optional reply brief is due 21 days after the answering brief is served. [Entered: 01/27/2026 04:42 PM]
|
| Filing 23 RELEASED FROM MEDIATION (text only). This case is released from the Mediation Program. All further inquiries regarding this appeal, including requests for extensions of time, should be directed to the Clerks office.Counsel are requested to contact the Circuit Mediator should circumstances develop that warrant settlement discussions. [Entered: 01/06/2026 11:33 AM] |
| Filing 22 REPLY to Opposition to Motion to Stay Removal (DE 21) filed by Petitioner Lorne Leroy Scott. [Entered: 12/11/2025 04:58 PM] |
| Filing 21 OPPOSITION to Motion to Stay Removal (DE 4) filed by Respondent Pamela Bondi. [Entered: 12/08/2025 02:46 PM] |
|
Filing 20
ORDER FILED. The motion (Docket Entry No. 19) for an extension of time to file a response to the motion for a stay of removal is granted. The response to the motion for a stay of removal is due December 8, 2025. The opening brief remains due January 29, 2026. The answering brief is due March 2, 2026. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after the answering brief is served. [Entered: 12/04/2025 04:34 PM]
|
| Filing 19 MOTION to extend time to respond to motion to stay removal filed by Respondent Pamela Bondi. [Entered: 12/01/2025 11:29 AM] |
|
Filing 18
ORDER FILED. The unopposed motion (Docket Entry No. 17) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. The response to the motion for a stay of removal remains due December 1, 2025. The opening brief is due January 29, 2026. The answering brief is due March 2, 2026. The optional reply brief is due 21 days after the answering brief is served. [Entered: 11/24/2025 10:29 AM]
|
| Filing 17 MOTION to Extend Time to File Brief filed by Petitioner Lorne Leroy Scott. [Entered: 11/21/2025 09:02 AM] |
| Filing 16 ADDED Counsel for Petitioner Claudia Valenzuela Rivas [Entered: 11/10/2025 02:45 PM] |
| Filing 15 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Claudia Valenzuela Rivas for Petitioner Lorne Leroy Scott. [Entered: 11/10/2025 02:11 PM] |
| Filing 14 SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION to Stay Removal filed by Petitioner Lorne Leroy Scott. [COURT ENTERED FILING to correct DE 13.] [Entered: 11/10/2025 11:49 AM] |
| Filing 13 DEFECTIVE --- MOTION to Stay Removal filed by Petitioner Lorne Leroy Scott. [Wrong filing type, correct entry is DE 14.] [Entered: 11/10/2025 11:42 AM] [Edited: 11/10/2025 11:50 AM] |
| Filing 12 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference, 1/6/2026, 11:00 a.m. PACIFIC Time. See order for instructions and details. [Entered: 10/15/2025 04:05 PM] |
|
Filing 11
ORDER FILED. The motion (Docket Entry No. 9) for an extension of time to file a supplemental motion for a stay of removal is granted. The supplemental motion for a stay of removal is due November 10, 2025. The response to the motion for a stay of removal is now due December 1, 2025. The opening brief remains due December 15, 2025. The answering brief is due January 14, 2026. The optional reply brief is due 21 days after the answering brief is served. [Entered: 10/08/2025 04:18 PM]
|
| Filing 10 CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed by DOJ Executive Office for Immigration Review. [Entered: 10/07/2025 08:33 AM] |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Extend Time to File Supplemental Motion to Stay Removal filed by Petitioner Lorne Leroy Scott. [COURT ENTERED FILING to correct DE 8.] [Entered: 10/03/2025 08:54 AM] |
| Filing 8 DEFECTIVE --- MOTION to Extend Time to File Motion filed by Petitioner Lorne Leroy Scott. [Wrong filing type, correct entry is DE 9.] [Entered: 10/02/2025 05:27 PM] [Edited: 10/03/2025 08:54 AM] |
| Filing 7 ADDED Counsel for Respondent Christin Whitacre [Entered: 09/29/2025 08:42 AM] |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Christin Whitacre for Respondent Pamela Bondi. [Entered: 09/27/2025 05:12 AM] |
| Filing 5 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Certified Administrative Record due (Respondent) 11/5/2025, Respondent Response to Stay Motion (Filed with PFR) due (Respondent) 11/26/2025, Immigration Petitioner Opening Brief due (Petitioner) 12/15/2025, Immigration Respondent Answering Brief due (Respondent) 1/14/2026. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1 [Entered: 09/26/2025 12:58 PM] |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Stay Removal filed by Petitioner Lorne Leroy Scott. REMOVAL STAYED pending further order of the court per General Order 6.4(c). [Entered: 09/26/2025 12:55 PM] |
| Filing 3 CASE OPENED. Petition for Review has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 9/26/2025. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-6070 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants), review the #Appellate Practice Guide, and counsel for petitioner(s) should also review the #Immigration Outline and consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 09/26/2025 12:52 PM] |
| Filing 2 AGENCY DECISION on review dated 9/26/2025. [Entered: 09/26/2025 12:52 PM] |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Petitioner Lorne Leroy Scott. [Entered: 09/26/2025 12:52 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
