Bartlett, et al. v. Hejazi, et al.
| JOSHUA SHANE BARTLETT, CALEB AIONA, TYRIK DAWKINS, JOSHUA JAMES-RICHARDS, TANIELA KINI KIN LATU, RICHARD OWENS, LEON MICHAEL POLASKI, ALEX SARAT XOTOY, TIMOTHY WILSON and WALTER BETSCHART |
| STATE OF OREGON |
| HAMID MICHAEL HEJAZI |
| 25-6217 |
| October 2, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 19, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 MANDATE ISSUED Consuelo M. CALLAHAN, Michelle T. FRIEDLAND, Daniel A. BRESS. The judgment of this Court, entered 2/25/2026, takes effect this date. [Entered: 03/19/2026 08:43 AM] |
| Filing 14 CLERK ACTION: Opening Brief submitted at DE 9 by Appellant Hamid Michael Hejazi is filed. Original + 0 copies. [Entered: 02/25/2026 03:06 PM] |
Filing 13
ORDER FILED. (Consuelo M. CALLAHAN, Michelle T. FRIEDLAND, Daniel A. BRESS). The motion (Docket Entry No. 11) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is treated as a motion to reinstate this appeal, and is granted. See Meyers v. Birdsong, 83 F.4th 1157, 1159 (9th Cir. 2023) (addressing standards for reinstatement). The dismissal order (Docket Entry No. 6) is vacated and the appeal is reinstated. The motion (Docket Entry No. 12) to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The clerk will file the opening brief at Docket Entry No. 9. Upon review of the record and opening brief, we conclude that the questions on review are too insubstantial to warrant further briefing. See 9th Cir. R. 3-6(a) (standard for summary disposition); see also United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir. 1982). The district court properly denied Hamid Michael Hejazis motion to intervene. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 24(a), (b); Perry v. Proposition 8 Official Proponents, 587 F.3d 947, 950 (9th Cir. 2009) (requirements for intervention as of right); Donnelly v. Glickman, 159 F.3d 405, 412 (9th Cir. 1998) (requirements for permissive intervention). The district courts September 5, 2025, order denying Hejazis intervention motion is affirmed. AFFIRMED. [Entered: 02/25/2026 10:36 AM]
|
| Filing 12 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Appellant Hamid Michael Hejazi. [Entered: 12/30/2025 11:27 AM] |
| Filing 11 MOTION to Extend Time to File Brief filed by Appellant Hamid Michael Hejazi. [Entered: 12/30/2025 11:16 AM] |
| Filing 10 Emergency MOTION Circuit Rule 27-3 Certificate filed by Appellee Joshua Shane Bartlett. [Entered: 12/30/2025 11:06 AM] |
| Filing 9 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Hamid Michael Hejazi. [Entered: 12/29/2025 01:50 PM] |
| Filing 8 MAIL RETURNED. DE 6 addressed to Appellant Hamid Michael Hejazi. Action taken: resending to c/o Sheila Thomas - LILA, 20 E 13th Ave, Eugene, 97401. [Entered: 12/23/2025 03:01 PM] |
| Filing 7 MAIL RETURNED. DE 4 addressed to Appellant Hamid Michael Hejazi. Action taken: resending to c/o Sheila Thomas - LILA, 20 E 13th Ave, Eugene, 97401 with a copy of DE 6. [Entered: 12/05/2025 09:45 AM] |
|
Filing 6
ORDER FILED. Appellant has not timely filed the opening brief or filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis or proof that fees were paid to the district court, as ordered by this court on October 23, 2025. This appeal is therefore dismissed. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. This order becomes the mandate of the court in 21 days. [Entered: 12/01/2025 04:02 PM]
|
| Filing 5 On November 13, 2025, the court issued a global order resetting the non-jurisdictional filing deadlines for federally funded attorneys (including FPDs and CJA counsel), that had been stayed by the courts October 1, 2025 Supplemental Administrative Order. If your deadlines were suspended by the October 1 Administrative Order, please review the #Order Resetting Deadlines, available on the courts website, to find your new deadlines. [Entered: 11/14/2025 05:06 PM] |
|
Filing 4
ORDER FILED. . Response to Fee Order due (Appellant) 11/20/2025 [Entered: 10/23/2025 04:35 PM]
|
| Filing 3 Amended Notice of Appeal Received. [Entered: 10/07/2025 10:16 AM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 11/14/2025, Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 12/15/2025. For appeal no. 25-6217, 3:23-cv-01097-CL. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 10/02/2025 04:05 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 3:23-cv-01097-CL has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-6217 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 10/02/2025 04:02 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
