McGhee v. Bondi, et al.
| JOSEPH MARTIN MCGHEE |
| PAMELA BONDI, ATTORNEY GENERAL, in her official capacity as United States Attorney General, DANIEL DRISCOLL, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the ATF, CITY OF FLAGSTAFF, a political subdivision of the State of Arizona, SEAN CONNOLLY, as an individual and in his official capacity as the City of Flagstaff Chief of Police and TODD MARTINET, as an individual and in his official capacity as Flagstaff Police Officer |
| 25-6326 |
| October 8, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 23, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 MOTION for Judicial Notice filed by Appellant Joseph Martin McGhee. [Entered: 12/23/2025 08:41 PM] |
| Filing 16 MOTION to File Supplemental Brief filed by Appellant Joseph Martin McGhee. [Entered: 12/21/2025 01:11 PM] |
| Filing 15 PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC filed by Appellant Joseph Martin McGhee. [Entered: 12/09/2025 11:41 AM] |
| Filing 14 SUPPLEMENT to Motion for Miscellaneous Relief (DE 13) filed by Appellant Joseph Martin McGhee. [Entered: 11/26/2025 02:31 PM] |
| Filing 13 MOTION for Miscellaneous Relief filed by Appellant Joseph Martin McGhee. [COURT ENTERED FILING to refile the motion in DE 12.] [Entered: 11/26/2025 08:50 AM] |
| Filing 12 Emergency MOTION Circuit Rule 27-3 Certificate filed by Appellant Joseph Martin McGhee. [Removed motion from certificate and refiled correctly at DE 13.] [Entered: 11/25/2025 07:55 PM] [Edited: 11/26/2025 08:52 AM] |
| Filing 11 PETITION FOR PANEL REHEARING filed by Appellant Joseph Martin McGhee. [Entered: 11/23/2025 09:41 AM] |
Filing 10
ORDER FILED. SILVERMAN, TALLMAN, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges. This court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the October 7, 2025 magistrate judge order is not final or immediately appealable. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; see also Flam v. Flam, 788 F.3d 1043, 1046 (9th Cir. 2015) (magistrate judge may hear and determine non-dispositive matters under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A)). This appeal is therefore dismissed. See 9th Cir. R. 3-6(b) (if court determines it lacks jurisdiction, court may dismiss appeal without notice or further proceedings). All pending motions are denied as moot. DISMISSED. [Entered: 11/21/2025 01:13 PM]
|
| Filing 9 On November 13, 2025, the court issued a global order resetting the non-jurisdictional filing deadlines for federally funded attorneys (including FPDs and CJA counsel), that had been stayed by the courts October 1, 2025 Supplemental Administrative Order. If your deadlines were suspended by the October 1 Administrative Order, please review the #Order Resetting Deadlines, available on the courts website, to find your new deadlines. [Entered: 11/14/2025 05:10 PM] |
| Filing 8 CLERK ACTION: Opening Brief submitted at DE 7 by Appellant Joseph Martin McGhee is filed. No paper copies are required. [Entered: 10/27/2025 09:38 AM] |
| Filing 7 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Joseph Martin McGhee. [Entered: 10/24/2025 02:46 PM] |
| Filing 6 CORRESPONDENCE filed by Appellant Joseph Martin McGhee.[COURT ENTERED-Filed from DE#5] [Entered: 10/14/2025 10:11 AM] |
| Filing 5 DEFECTIVE---NOTICE of Delay filed by Appellant Joseph Martin McGhee.[Filed under wrong event. Correct entry#6] [Entered: 10/12/2025 02:29 PM] [Edited: 10/14/2025 10:12 AM] |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Stay Lower Court or Agency Proceedings/Order/Judgment filed by Appellant Joseph Martin McGhee. [COURT ENTERED FILING to refile the motion in DE 3.] [Entered: 10/09/2025 07:50 AM] |
| Filing 3 Emergency MOTION Circuit Rule 27-3 Certificate filed by Appellant Joseph Martin McGhee. [COURT UPDATE: Removed motion and refiled at DE 4.] [Entered: 10/08/2025 08:07 PM] [Edited: 10/09/2025 07:51 AM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 11/17/2025, Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 12/17/2025. For appeal no. 25-6326, 3:25-cv-08143-DJH. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 10/08/2025 10:07 AM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 3:25-cv-08143-DJH has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-6326 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 10/08/2025 10:01 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: McGhee v. Bondi, et al. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: JOSEPH MARTIN MCGHEE | |
| Represented By: | Joseph Martin McGhee |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: PAMELA BONDI, ATTORNEY GENERAL, in her official capacity as United States Attorney General | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: DANIEL DRISCOLL, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the ATF | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: CITY OF FLAGSTAFF, a political subdivision of the State of Arizona | |
| Represented By: | Larry Jay Crown |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: SEAN CONNOLLY, as an individual and in his official capacity as the City of Flagstaff Chief of Police | |
| Represented By: | Larry Jay Crown |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: TODD MARTINET, as an individual and in his official capacity as Flagstaff Police Officer | |
| Represented By: | Larry Jay Crown |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
