West v. Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority
| JAMES WEST |
| SANTA CLARA VALLEY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY |
| 25-6354 |
| October 8, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 31, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ORDER FILED. The motion (Docket Entry No. 12) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. The opening brief is due May 6, 2026. The answering brief is due June 5, 2026. The optional reply brief is due 21 days after the answering brief is served. [Entered: 03/31/2026 03:16 PM]
|
| Filing 13 RESPONSE to Motion to Extend Time to File Brief (DE 12) filed by Appellee Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority. [Entered: 03/18/2026 04:33 PM] |
| Filing 12 MOTION to Extend Time to File Brief filed by Appellant James West. [Entered: 03/12/2026 10:17 PM] |
Filing 11
ORDER FILED. The motion (Docket Entry No. 7) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. The opening brief is due March 12, 2026. The answering brief is due April 13, 2026. The optional reply brief is due 21 days after the answering brief is served. [Entered: 01/20/2026 11:21 AM]
|
| Filing 10 RESPONSE to Motion to Extend Time to File Brief (DE 7) filed by Appellee Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority. [Entered: 01/15/2026 04:38 PM] |
| Filing 9 ADDED Counsel for Appellee Lindsey Schmidt [Entered: 01/15/2026 09:38 AM] |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Lindsey Schmidt for Appellee Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority. [Entered: 01/15/2026 09:34 AM] |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Extend Time to File Brief filed by Appellant James West. [Entered: 01/07/2026 11:38 PM] |
| Filing 6 TEXT ORDER FILED. The motion (Docket Entry No. 5) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. The opening brief is due January 7, 2026. The answering brief is due February 6, 2026. The optional reply brief is due 21 days after the answering brief is served. [Entered: 11/28/2025 10:33 AM] |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Extend Time to File Brief filed by Appellant James West. [Entered: 11/24/2025 12:02 PM] |
Filing 4
ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief (DE 3) denied. The request is late. The filer must file a motion per 9th Cir. R. 31-2.2(b). [Entered: 11/18/2025 03:57 PM]
|
| Filing 3 Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief filed by Appellant James West. [Entered: 11/18/2025 09:05 AM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 11/17/2025, Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 12/17/2025. For appeal no. 25-6354, 5:23-cv-04554-NC. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 10/08/2025 03:40 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 5:23-cv-04554-NC has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-6354 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 10/08/2025 03:29 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: West v. Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: JAMES WEST | |
| Represented By: | Mr. James West |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: SANTA CLARA VALLEY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY | |
| Represented By: | Mr. Richard D. North, III |
| Represented By: | Lindsey Schmidt |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.