Makhmatov, et al. v. Blanche
| RAMAZAN MAKHMATOV and UMUKUSUM MAGOMEDOVA |
| PAMELA BONDI, ATTORNEY GENERAL and TODD BLANCHE, ACTING ATTORNEY GENERAL |
| 25-6454 |
| October 14, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 8, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 47 Respondent Pamela Bondi substituted by Todd Blanche effective 04/08/2026. [Entered: 04/08/2026 01:39 PM] |
Filing 46
ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief (DE 45) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Answering Brief Due (Respondent) 5/15/2026. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 03/26/2026 11:25 AM]
|
| Filing 45 Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief filed by Respondent Pamela Bondi. [Entered: 03/26/2026 09:36 AM] |
| Filing 44 Attorney Spencer Shucard as Counsel for Respondent substituted for Attorney Nelle M. Seymour. [Entered: 03/26/2026 09:09 AM] |
| Filing 43 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Spencer Shucard for Respondent Pamela Bondi replacing Nelle M. Seymour. [Entered: 03/25/2026 09:57 PM] |
| Filing 42 CLERK ACTION: Opening Brief submitted at DE 41 by Petitioner Ramazan Makhmatov, Petitioner Umukusum Magomedova is filed. No paper copies are required. [Entered: 03/17/2026 12:33 PM] |
| Filing 41 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Petitioner Ramazan Makhmatov, Petitioner Umukusum Magomedova. [Entered: 03/16/2026 10:06 PM] |
Filing 40
ORDER FILED. The motion (Docket Entry No. 33) for an extension of time to file a reply to the governments opposition to the motion for a stay of removal is granted. The reply has been filed. The motion (Docket Entry No. 39) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. The opening brief is due March 16, 2026. The answering brief is due April 15, 2026. The optional reply brief is due 21 days after the answering brief is served. [Entered: 01/27/2026 10:15 AM]
|
| Filing 39 MOTION to Extend Time to File Brief filed by Petitioner Ramazan Makhmatov, Petitioner Umukusum Magomedova. [Entered: 01/14/2026 12:07 PM] |
| Filing 38 REPLY to Opposition to Motion to Stay Removal (DE 32) filed by Petitioner Ramazan Makhmatov, Petitioner Umukusum Magomedova. [Entered: 01/05/2026 05:56 PM] |
| Filing 37 ADDED Counsel for Petitioner Michael Frederick Tubach [Entered: 01/05/2026 12:45 PM] |
| Filing 36 TERMINATED participation of Counsel for Petitioner Anna Pletcher, representing Petitioner Ramazan Makhmatov, Petitioner Umukusum Magomedova. [Entered: 01/05/2026 12:41 PM] |
| Filing 35 NOTICE of Withdrawal as Counsel filed by Anna Pletcher. Counsel withdrawing on behalf of other attorney(s): No [[-]]. Party proceeding without counsel: No. [-]. [Entered: 01/05/2026 12:06 PM] |
| Filing 34 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Michael Frederick Tubach for Petitioner Ramazan Makhmatov, Petitioner Umukusum Magomedova. [Entered: 01/05/2026 11:36 AM] |
| Filing 33 MOTION to Extend Time to Reply to Response to Motion filed by Petitioner Ramazan Makhmatov, Petitioner Umukusum Magomedova. [Entered: 12/22/2025 04:35 PM] |
| Filing 32 OPPOSITION to Motion to Stay Removal (DE 2) filed by Respondent Pamela Bondi. [Entered: 12/19/2025 11:55 AM] |
| Filing 31 ADDED Counsel for Petitioner Ciara Reed [Entered: 12/10/2025 10:39 AM] |
| Filing 30 ADDED Counsel for Petitioner Rahul Kohli [Entered: 12/10/2025 10:37 AM] |
| Filing 29 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Ciara Reed for Petitioner Ramazan Makhmatov, Petitioner Umukusum Magomedova. [Entered: 12/10/2025 10:28 AM] |
| Filing 28 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Rahul Kohli for Petitioner Ramazan Makhmatov, Petitioner Umukusum Magomedova. [Entered: 12/10/2025 10:20 AM] |
Filing 27
ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief (DE 26) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Opening Brief Due (Petitioner) 2/2/2026, Answering Brief Due (Respondent) 3/4/2026. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 12/04/2025 01:33 PM]
|
| Filing 26 Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief filed by Petitioner Ramazan Makhmatov, Petitioner Umukusum Magomedova. [Entered: 12/04/2025 08:15 AM] |
| Filing 25 SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION to Stay Removal filed by Petitioner Ramazan Makhmatov, Petitioner Umukusum Magomedova. [Court entered filing to correct DE 24] [Entered: 12/01/2025 09:47 AM] |
| Filing 24 DEFECTIVE---MOTION to Stay Removal filed by Petitioner Ramazan Makhmatov, Petitioner Umukusum Magomedova. [Wrong filing type, corrected in DE 25] [Entered: 11/28/2025 07:12 PM] [Edited: 12/01/2025 09:47 AM] |
| Filing 23 ADDED Counsel for Petitioner Josh Cayetano [Entered: 11/24/2025 04:45 PM] |
| Filing 22 ADDED Counsel for Petitioner Anna Pletcher [Entered: 11/24/2025 04:44 PM] |
| Filing 21 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Josh Cayetano for Petitioner Ramazan Makhmatov, Petitioner Umukusum Magomedova. [Entered: 11/24/2025 02:31 PM] |
| Filing 20 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Anna Pletcher for Petitioner Ramazan Makhmatov, Petitioner Umukusum Magomedova. [Entered: 11/24/2025 02:05 PM] |
| Filing 19 RESPONSE to Mail Returned (DE 18) filed by Respondent Pamela Bondi. [Entered: 11/12/2025 01:17 PM] |
| Filing 18 MAIL RETURNED. DE 6 and DE 8 addressed to Petitioner Umukusum Magomedova. Action taken: governments counsel is directed to take all reasonable means to effect delivery (see attached notice). [Entered: 11/05/2025 11:22 AM] |
Filing 17
ORDER FILED. The motion (Docket Entry No. 4) for appointment of counsel is denied as unnecessary because counsel has appeared on behalf of petitioners. The motion (Docket Entry No. 16) for an extension of time to file a supplemental motion for a stay of removal is granted. The supplemental motion for a stay of removal is due November 28, 2025. The response to the motion for a stay of removal is now due December 19, 2025. The opening brief is due January 2, 2026. The answering brief is due February 2, 2026. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 10/30/2025 03:35 PM]
|
| Filing 16 MOTION to Extend Time to File Supplemental to Stay Removal filed by Petitioner Ramazan Makhmatov, Petitioner Umukusum Magomedova. [Entered: 10/27/2025 11:32 AM] |
| Filing 15 ADDED Counsel for Petitioner Elizabeth Arias [Entered: 10/27/2025 09:19 AM] |
| Filing 14 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Elizabeth Arias for Petitioner Ramazan Makhmatov, Petitioner Umukusum Magomedova. [Entered: 10/24/2025 05:40 PM] |
| Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Petitioner Ramazan Makhmatov. [Entered: 10/21/2025 04:45 PM] |
| Filing 12 CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed by DOJ Executive Office for Immigration Review. [Entered: 10/21/2025 09:13 AM] |
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Nelle M. Seymour for Respondent Pamela Bondi. [Entered: 10/15/2025 02:15 PM] |
| Filing 10 ADDED Counsel for Respondent Nelle M. Seymour [Entered: 10/15/2025 02:04 PM] |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Nelle M. Seymour for Respondent Pamela Bondi. [Entered: 10/15/2025 01:55 PM] |
Filing 8
ORDER FILED. Lisa B. Fitzgerald, Appellate Commissioner. The motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Docket Entry No. 3) is granted. The certified administrative record remains due November 24, 2025. The response to the motion for a stay of removal remains due December 15, 2025. Briefing is stayed pending resolution of the motion for appointment of counsel. See 9th Cir. R. 27-11. [Entered: 10/15/2025 01:40 PM]
|
| Filing 7 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Certified Administrative Record due (Respondent) 11/24/2025, Respondent Response to Stay Motion (Filed with PFR) due (Respondent) 12/15/2025, Immigration Petitioner Opening Brief due (Petitioner) 1/2/2026, Immigration Respondent Answering Brief due (Respondent) 2/2/2026. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1 [Entered: 10/14/2025 01:12 PM] |
| Filing 6 Under General Order 6.4, a temporary stay of removal is in effect until further order of the court. [Entered: 10/14/2025 01:09 PM] |
| Filing 5 CASE OPENED. Petition for Review has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 10/9/2025. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-6454 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants), review the #Appellate Practice Guide, and counsel for petitioner(s) should also review the #Immigration Outline and consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 10/14/2025 01:07 PM] |
| Filing 4 MOTION for appointment of counsel filed by Petitioner Ramazan Makhmatov, Petitioner Umukusum Magomedova. [Entered: 10/14/2025 01:06 PM] |
| Filing 3 MOTION to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Petitioner Ramazan Makhmatov, Petitioner Umukusum Magomedova. [Entered: 10/14/2025 01:06 PM] |
| Filing 2 MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 10/14/2025 01:06 PM] |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Petitioner Ramazan Makhmatov, Petitioner Umukusum Magomedova. [Entered: 10/14/2025 01:06 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.