Engel v. Paragon Systems Inc., et al.
| JULIUS M. ENGEL |
| PARAGON SYSTEMS INC., FEDERAL PROTECTIVE SERVICE, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, STEVEN O'CONNOR, DEBRA HARRIS, RICHARD CASTRELLON, ROBERT MARQUEZ, JOHN HODEK, DARIN BIGGERS, SHEILA SHARMA, FIDEL REAL V. VASQUEZ, JR., M.D. and SACRAMENTO OCCUPATIONAL MEDICAL GROUP |
| 25-6474 |
| October 14, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Americans w/Disabilities Act-Empl |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 9, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 MANDATE ISSUED Richard R. CLIFTON, Andrew D. HURWITZ, Daniel A. BRESS. The judgment of this Court, entered 12/18/2025, takes effect this date. [Entered: 02/09/2026 09:40 AM] |
Filing 7
ORDER FILED. (Richard R. CLIFTON, Andrew D. HURWITZ, Daniel A. BRESS) A district courts dismissal order is not final or immediately appealable under 28 U.S.C. 1291 unless it disposes of all claims as to all parties or unless judgment is entered in compliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b). Romoland Sch. Dist. v. Inland Empire Energy Ctr., LLC, 548 F.3d 738, 747 (9th Cir. 2008) (citing Chacon v. Babcock, 640 F.2d 221, 222 (9th Cir. 1981)). [A] plaintiff, who has been given leave to amend, may not file a notice of appeal simply because he does not choose to file an amended complaint. A further district court determination must be obtained. WMX Techs., Inc. v. Miller, 104 F.3d 1133, 1136 (9th Cir. 1997); see also 28 U.S.C. 1291; Green v. Occidental Petroleum Corp., 541 F.2d 1335, 1338 (9th Cir. 1976) (district court must be of the opinion that the criteria of section 1292(b) are met; court of appeals is without authority to assume an appeal unilaterally). This court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the September 29, 2025 order granted leave to amend some claims. This appeal is therefore dismissed. See 9th Cir. R. 3-6(b) (if court determines it lacks jurisdiction, court may dismiss appeal without notice or further proceedings). DISMISSED. [Entered: 12/18/2025 01:54 PM]
|
| Filing 6 On November 13, 2025, the court issued a global order resetting the non-jurisdictional filing deadlines for federally funded attorneys (including FPDs and CJA counsel), that had been stayed by the courts October 1, 2025 Supplemental Administrative Order. If your deadlines were suspended by the October 1 Administrative Order, please review the #Order Resetting Deadlines, available on the courts website, to find your new deadlines. [Entered: 11/14/2025 04:59 PM] |
| Filing 5 REPLY to Response to Court Order (DE 4) filed by Appellee Paragon Systems Inc.. [Entered: 11/13/2025 04:22 PM] |
| Filing 4 RESPONSE to Order - Order to Show Cause (OSC) (DE 3) filed by Appellant Julius M. Engel. [Entered: 11/04/2025 04:12 PM] |
|
Filing 3
ORDER FILED. [A] plaintiff, who has been given leave to amend, may not file a notice of appeal simply because he does not choose to file an amended complaint. A further district court determination must be obtained. WMX Techs., Inc. v. Miller, 104 F.3d 1133, 1136 (9th Cir. 1997); see also 28 U.S.C. 1291. This court may therefore lack jurisdiction over this appeal. Within 21 days, appellant must either file a motion to voluntarily dismiss this appeal or file a statement explaining why it should not be dismissed. If appellant does not do so, the court will dismiss the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. If appellant files a statement, appellees may file a response within 10 days. Briefing is stayed. [Entered: 10/16/2025 03:47 PM]
|
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 11/24/2025, Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 12/24/2025. For appeal no. 25-6474, 2:24-cv-02479-DJC-CKD. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 10/14/2025 03:57 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:24-cv-02479-DJC-CKD has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-6474 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 10/14/2025 03:53 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
