Bateman v. United States of America
| SAMUEL RAPPYLEE BATEMAN |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 25-6481 |
| October 15, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Vacate Sentence |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 4, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER FILED. (Milan D. SMITH, Jr., Jacqueline H. NGUYEN, Lucy H. KOH) Appellants response to appellees motion for summary disposition was filed on December 22, 2025. Appellants motion (Docket Entry No. 10) for leave to file a reply to the motion for summary disposition is unnecessary. The motion (Docket Entry No. 9) for summary disposition is granted. See 9th Cir. R. 3-6(a) (standard for summary disposition); United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir. 1982). The district courts September 18, 2025 order denying appellants motion for a preliminary injunction is affirmed. AFFIRMED. [Entered: 03/04/2026 11:53 AM]
|
| Filing 12 REPLY to Response to Motion for Summary Disposition or to Dismiss (DE 11) filed by Appellee United States of America. [Entered: 12/30/2025 07:11 AM] |
| Filing 11 RESPONSE to Motion for Summary Disposition or to Dismiss (DE 9) filed by Appellant Samuel Rappylee Bateman. [Entered: 12/23/2025 09:02 AM] |
| Filing 10 MOTION for Leave to File Reply filed by Appellant Samuel Rappylee Bateman. [Entered: 12/23/2025 09:00 AM] |
| Filing 9 MOTION for Summary Disposition or to Dismiss filed by Appellee United States of America. [Entered: 12/09/2025 02:52 PM] |
| Filing 8 RESPONSE to Mail Returned (DE 7) filed by Appellee United States of America. [Entered: 11/18/2025 01:12 PM] |
| Filing 7 MAIL RETURNED. DE 2 addressed to Appellant Samuel Rappylee Bateman. Action taken: governments counsel is directed to take all reasonable means to effect delivery (see attached notice). [Entered: 11/17/2025 04:50 PM] |
| Filing 6 On November 13, 2025, the court issued a global order resetting the non-jurisdictional filing deadlines for federally funded attorneys (including FPDs and CJA counsel), that had been stayed by the courts October 1, 2025 Supplemental Administrative Order. If your deadlines were suspended by the October 1 Administrative Order, please review the #Order Resetting Deadlines, available on the courts website, to find your new deadlines. [Entered: 11/14/2025 05:01 PM] |
| Filing 5 CLERK ACTION: Opening Brief submitted at DE 4 by Appellant Samuel Rappylee Bateman is filed. Original and 0 copies. (IFP motion pending, briefing remains stayed) [Entered: 11/12/2025 02:23 PM] |
| Filing 4 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Samuel Rappylee Bateman. [Entered: 11/12/2025 02:23 PM] |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Appellant Samuel Rappylee Bateman. [Entered: 11/12/2025 02:21 PM] |
| Filing 2 PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION SCHEDULE NOTICE. Preliminary Injunction Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 11/12/2025, Preliminary Injunction Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 12/10/2025. For appeal no. 25-6481, 3:25-cv-08118-SMB--ESW.All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 10/15/2025 07:18 AM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 3:25-cv-08118-SMB--ESW has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-6481 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 10/15/2025 07:14 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Bateman v. United States of America | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: SAMUEL RAPPYLEE BATEMAN | |
| Represented By: | Samuel Rappylee Bateman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Ryan Powell |
| Represented By: | Jillian Marie Besancon |
| Represented By: | Mrs. Dimitra Sampson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
