Pinzon, et al. v. Pepperdine University
Petitioner: PEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY
Respondent: JOSEPH PINZON and MATTHEW REZVANI, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Case Number: 25-6548
Filed: October 17, 2025
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 20, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 20, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER FILED. (Barry G. SILVERMAN, Patrick J. BUMATAY) The petition for permission to appeal is granted. See 28 U.S.C. 1292(b). Within 14 days, petitioner must comply with Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 5(d)(1). [Entered: 11/20/2025 03:06 PM]
October 27, 2025 Filing 5 ANSWER to Petition for Permission to Appeal Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1292(b) (DE 1) filed by Respondent Joseph Pinzon, Respondent Matthew Rezvani. [Entered: 10/27/2025 12:22 PM]
October 17, 2025 Filing 4 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Petitioner Pepperdine University. [Entered: 10/17/2025 10:21 AM]
October 17, 2025 Filing 3 SCHEDULE NOTICE for Petition for Permission to Appeal. [Entered: 10/17/2025 08:23 AM]
October 17, 2025 Filing 2 CASE OPENED. Your case opening documents have been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 10/16/2025. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-6548 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for assistance. [Entered: 10/17/2025 08:21 AM]
October 16, 2025 Filing 1 PETITION for Permission to Appeal Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1292(b) filed by Petitioner Pepperdine University. [Entered: 10/17/2025 08:18 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Pinzon, et al. v. Pepperdine University
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: JOSEPH PINZON
Represented By: Steve Berman
Represented By: Daniel Kurowski
Represented By: Christopher R. Pitoun
Represented By: Mr. Carney Richard Shegerian
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: MATTHEW REZVANI, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Represented By: Ms. Cheryl Kenner
Represented By: Anthony Nguyen
Represented By: Daniel Kurowski
Represented By: Mr. Carney Richard Shegerian
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: PEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY
Represented By: David R. Sugden
Represented By: Ms. Stacey Hsiang Chun Wang
Represented By: Kristina Starr Azlin
Represented By: Qian Shen
Represented By: Mr. Vito Anthony Costanzo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?