King v. Garrett, et al.
Petitioner: ALEXANDER STEVEN KING
Respondent: TIM GARRETT and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Case Number: 25-6601
Filed: October 20, 2025
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 9, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 9, 2026 Filing 8 MOTION for Certificate of Appealability filed by Appellant Alexander Steven King. [Entered: 03/09/2026 01:41 PM]
March 4, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER FILED. Appellants motion (Docket Entry No. 6) for a second extension of time to file a request for a certificate of appealability (COA) is granted. Any request for a COA is due by March 17, 2026. [Entered: 03/04/2026 04:00 PM]
March 3, 2026 Filing 6 MOTION to Extend Time to File Motion filed by Appellant Alexander Steven King. [Entered: 03/03/2026 02:46 PM]
January 2, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER FILED. Appellants motion (Docket Entry No. 4) for an extension of time to file a request for a certificate of appealability (COA) is granted. Any request for a COA is due by March 3, 2026. [Entered: 01/02/2026 02:12 PM]
December 31, 2025 Filing 4 MOTION to Extend Time to File Motion filed by Appellant Alexander Steven King. [Entered: 12/31/2025 10:42 AM]
November 3, 2025 Filing 3 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Appellant Alexander Steven King. [Entered: 11/03/2025 08:37 AM]
October 20, 2025 Filing 2 COA SCHEDULE NOTICE. Needs a certificate of appealability. Date COA denied in DC: 09/23/2025. [Entered: 10/20/2025 01:26 PM]
October 20, 2025 Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 3:18-cv-00202-MMD-WGC has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-6601 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 10/20/2025 01:23 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: King v. Garrett, et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: ALEXANDER STEVEN KING
Represented By: Mr. Martin H. Lopez-Novillo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: TIM GARRETT
Represented By: Ms. Erica Berrett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Represented By: Ms. Erica Berrett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?