Ortiz v. Fontes, et al.
Petitioner: RENE ORTIZ and El Sariqueno
Respondent: ADRIAN FONTES, in his official capacity as Secretary of State of Arizona, MARK KIMBLE, Chairman, Citizens Clean Election Commissioner and CITIZENS CLEAN ELECTIONS COMMISSION
Case Number: 25-6602
Filed: October 20, 2025
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 16, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 16, 2026 Filing 8 MOTION for Miscellaneous Relief filed by Appellant Rene Ortiz. [Entered: 03/16/2026 01:56 PM]
January 20, 2026 Filing 7 MOTION for Miscellaneous Relief filed by Appellant Rene Ortiz. [Entered: 01/20/2026 02:48 PM]
November 26, 2025 Filing 6 SUPPLEMENT to Response to Order - Order to Show Cause (OSC) (DE 5) filed by Appellant Rene Ortiz. [Entered: 11/28/2025 08:59 AM]
November 20, 2025 Filing 5 RESPONSE to Order - Order to Show Cause (OSC) (DE 3) filed by Appellant Rene Ortiz. [Entered: 11/21/2025 02:29 PM]
October 28, 2025 Filing 4 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Appellant Rene Ortiz. [Entered: 10/28/2025 02:32 PM]
October 23, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER FILED. It appears that this appeal may be frivolous. If the appeal is frivolous, the court will deny permission to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days, appellant must: (1) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous and a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, OR (2) file a motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). If appellant files a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous, or any other response other than a motion to dismiss, the court will determine whether the appeal is frivolous. If it is frivolous, the appeal will be dismissed. If it is not frivolous, the appeal will proceed. Briefing is stayed. If appellant does not respond to this order, the court may dismiss this appeal without further notice. The clerk will serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward, and (3) a Form 4 financial affidavit. [Entered: 10/23/2025 03:59 PM]
October 20, 2025 Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 12/2/2025. For appeal no. 25-6602, 2:25-cv-02505-SHD. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 10/20/2025 01:36 PM]
October 20, 2025 Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:25-cv-02505-SHD has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-6602 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 10/20/2025 01:34 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Ortiz v. Fontes, et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: RENE ORTIZ
Represented By: Rene Ortiz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: El Sariqueno
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: ADRIAN FONTES, in his official capacity as Secretary of State of Arizona
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: MARK KIMBLE, Chairman, Citizens Clean Election Commissioner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: CITIZENS CLEAN ELECTIONS COMMISSION
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?