Emrit v. United States Patent and Trademark Office, et al.
Plaintiff: RONALD SATISH EMRIT, Presidential Committee/Political Action Committee/Separate Segregated Fund (SSF) Number C00569897, doing business as United Emrits of America, also known as Presidential Candidate Number P60005535
Defendant: UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, USPTO, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, NASA GODDARD SPACE FLIGHT CENTER, (GSFC) in Greenbelt, Maryland, AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF PHYSICS, AIP, KENNEDY SPACE CENTER, in Cape Canaveral, Florida and NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION, (NSF)
Case Number: 25-6631
Filed: October 21, 2025
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Patent
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 21, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 21, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER FILED. Barry G. SILVERMAN, Richard C. TALLMAN, Patrick J. BUMATAY. This court has reviewed the October 9, 2025 notice of appeal and the district court record pursuant to the pre-filing review order entered in appeal No. 15-80221. Because this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal, it will not be permitted to proceed. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; See Serine v. Peterson, 989 F.2d 371, 372-73 (9th Cir. 1993) (magistrate judges findings and recommendations not appealable; premature appeal not cured by subsequent entry of final judgment by district court); see also In re Thomas, 508 F.3d 1225 (9th Cir. 2007). Appeal No. 25-6631 is therefore dismissed. The court declines to transfer this appeal to the United States Court of Appeal for the Tenth Circuit. See 28 U.S.C. 1631. This order, served on the district court for the District of Kansas constitutes the mandate of this court. No further filings will be entertained. DISMISSED. [Entered: 11/21/2025 11:04 AM]
October 21, 2025 Filing 2 PREFILING REVIEW DOCKETING NOTICE. This case has been opened and assigned the Ninth Circuit case number 25-6631. This case is subject to a pre-filing review order entered in case number 15-80221, and will be reviewed by the Court to determine whether it will be permitted to proceed. [COURT UPDATE: resending NDA to include district court clerk] [Entered: 10/21/2025 09:51 AM] [Edited: 10/21/2025 09:55 AM]
October 21, 2025 Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:25-cv-02490-EFM-TJJ has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-6631 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 10/21/2025 09:46 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Emrit v. United States Patent and Trademark Office, et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: RONALD SATISH EMRIT, Presidential Committee/Political Action Committee/Separate Segregated Fund (SSF) Number C00569897, doing business as United Emrits of America, also known as Presidential Candidate Number P60005535
Represented By: Ronald Satish Emrit
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, USPTO
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: NASA GODDARD SPACE FLIGHT CENTER, (GSFC) in Greenbelt, Maryland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF PHYSICS, AIP
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: KENNEDY SPACE CENTER, in Cape Canaveral, Florida
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION, (NSF)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?