United States of America v. Arrington
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: ALEX WILLIAM ARRINGTON
Case Number: 25-6638
Filed: October 21, 2025
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 11, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 11, 2026 Filing 15 TEXT ORDER FILED. The motion (Docket Entry No. 14) for an extension of time to file the answering brief is granted. The answering brief is due May 15, 2026. The optional reply brief is due 21 days after the answering brief is served. [Entered: 03/11/2026 05:13 PM]
March 6, 2026 Filing 14 MOTION to Extend Time to File Brief filed by Appellee United States of America. [Entered: 03/06/2026 12:50 PM]
February 12, 2026 Filing 13 CLERK ACTION: Opening Brief submitted at DE 10 and Excerpts of Record at DE 11 by Appellant Alex William Arrington are filed. No paper copies are required. [Entered: 02/12/2026 02:38 PM]
February 12, 2026 Filing 12 Presentence Report UNDER SEAL filed by Appellant Alex William Arrington. [Entered: 02/12/2026 01:49 PM]
February 12, 2026 Filing 11 EXCERPTS OF RECORD submitted for filing by Appellant Alex William Arrington. [Entered: 02/12/2026 01:47 PM]
February 12, 2026 Filing 10 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Alex William Arrington. [Entered: 02/12/2026 01:46 PM]
January 30, 2026 Filing 9 Attorney Samuel Macomber as Counsel for Appellant substituted for Attorney Hannah Grace Pugh, Heidi Johnson. [Entered: 01/30/2026 09:21 AM]
January 30, 2026 Filing 8 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Samuel Macomber for Appellant Alex William Arrington replacing Hannah Grace Pugh, Heidi Johnson. [Entered: 01/30/2026 06:39 AM]
January 6, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief (DE 6) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 2/12/2026, Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 3/16/2026. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 01/06/2026 03:08 PM]
January 6, 2026 Filing 6 Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief filed by Appellant Alex William Arrington. [Entered: 01/06/2026 02:54 PM]
November 18, 2025 Filing 5 TEXT ONLY ORDER: On November 13, 2025, the court issued a global order resetting the non-jurisdictional filing deadlines for federally funded attorneys (including FPDs and CJA counsel), that had been stayed by the courts October 1, 2025 Supplemental Administrative Order. If your deadlines were suspended by the October 1 Administrative Order, please review the #Order Resetting Deadlines, available on the courts website, to find your new deadlines. [Entered: 11/18/2025 06:45 PM]
October 22, 2025 Filing 4 TERMINATED participation of Counsel for Appellee David James Morse, representing Appellee United States of America. [Entered: 10/22/2025 10:50 AM]
October 22, 2025 Filing 3 NOTICE of Withdrawal as Counsel filed by David James Morse. Counsel withdrawing on behalf of other attorney(s): No [[-]]. Party proceeding without counsel: No. [-]. [Entered: 10/22/2025 10:44 AM]
October 21, 2025 Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Sentence Imposed: 42 Months. Appeal Transcript Order Due (Appellant) 11/4/2025, Appeal Transcript Due (Appellant) 12/4/2025, Appeal Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 1/13/2026, Appeal Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 2/12/2026. For appeal no. 25-6638, 1:25-cr-00007-BLW-1. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule may result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1 [Entered: 10/21/2025 02:18 PM]
October 21, 2025 Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 1:25-cr-00007-BLW-1 has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-6638 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 10/21/2025 02:15 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: United States of America v. Arrington
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: David James Morse
Represented By: Mr. William Max Humphries
Represented By: Kelsey Ann Manweiler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ALEX WILLIAM ARRINGTON
Represented By: Heidi Johnson
Represented By: Hannah Grace Pugh
Represented By: Mr. Samuel Macomber
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?