United States of America v. Swartz
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| JESSE FRANKLIN SWARTZ and Franklin Wright |
| 25-6643 |
| October 21, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 19, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 21 MANDATE ISSUED Barry G. SILVERMAN, Richard A. PAEZ, Holly A. THOMAS. The judgment of this Court, entered 1/28/2026, takes effect this date. [Entered: 02/19/2026 08:50 AM] |
Filing 20
ORDER FILED. (Barry G. SILVERMAN, Richard A. PAEZ, Holly A. THOMAS) Having reviewed the record and appellants response to the courts December 11, 2025, order, we dismiss this appeal as moot. See United States v. King, 891 F.3d 868 (9th Cir. 2018). All pending motions are denied as moot. DISMISSED. [Entered: 01/28/2026 11:39 AM]
|
| Filing 19 RESPONSE to Order - Order to Show Cause (OSC) (DE 18) filed by Appellant Jesse Franklin Swartz. [Entered: 12/11/2025 11:08 AM] |
|
Filing 18
ORDER FILED. Appellant appears to have fully served his revocation sentence of 96 days, with no supervision to follow. This appeal therefore appears to be moot. See United States v. King, 891 F.3d 868 (9th Cir. 2018). Within 21 days, appellant must either file a motion to voluntarily dismiss this appeal or file a statement explaining why it should not be dismissed as moot. If appellant does not do so, the court will dismiss the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. If appellant files a statement, appellee may file a response within 10 days. All pending motions are held in abeyance pending appellants compliance with this order. Briefing is stayed. [Entered: 12/11/2025 10:11 AM]
|
| Filing 17 CLERK ACTION: Opening Brief submitted at DE 16 by Appellant Jesse Franklin Swartz is filed. Original and 0 copies of brief, original and 1 copy of addendum. (Briefing remains stayed, motions pending) (Entry updated to reflect receipt of appendix) [Entered: 12/03/2025 01:18 PM] [Edited: 12/04/2025 01:42 PM] |
| Filing 16 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Jesse Franklin Swartz.--[COURT UPDATE: PDF of addendum attached as of 12/4/2025] [Entered: 12/03/2025 01:17 PM] [Edited: 12/04/2025 01:41 PM] |
| Filing 15 Miscellaneous Pro Se Filings Filed [Entered: 12/01/2025 11:07 AM] |
| Filing 14 TEXT ONLY ORDER: On November 13, 2025, the court issued a global order resetting the non-jurisdictional filing deadlines for federally funded attorneys (including FPDs and CJA counsel), that had been stayed by the courts October 1, 2025 Supplemental Administrative Order. If your deadlines were suspended by the October 1 Administrative Order, please review the #Order Resetting Deadlines, available on the courts website, to find your new deadlines. [Entered: 11/18/2025 06:43 PM] |
| Filing 13 Miscellaneous Pro Se Filings Filed [Entered: 11/18/2025 03:23 PM] |
| Filing 12 CORRESPONDENCE filed by Appellant Jesse Franklin Swartz. [Entered: 11/18/2025 03:21 PM] |
| Filing 11 SUPPLEMENT to Response to Motion for Release from Detention (DE 9) filed by Appellee United States of America. [Entered: 11/14/2025 10:22 AM] |
| Filing 10 SUPPLEMENT to Motion for Release from Detention (DE 7) filed by Appellant Jesse Franklin Swartz. [Entered: 11/10/2025 04:15 PM] |
| Filing 9 RESPONSE to Motion for Release from Detention (DE 7) filed by Appellee United States of America. [Entered: 11/07/2025 09:41 AM] |
| Filing 8 SUPPLEMENT to Motion for Release from Detention (DE 7) filed by Appellant Jesse Franklin Swartz. [Entered: 11/04/2025 04:19 PM] |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Release from Detention filed by Appellant Jesse Franklin Swartz. [Entered: 10/30/2025 02:02 PM] |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Appellant Jesse Franklin Swartz. [Entered: 10/30/2025 01:59 PM] |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Extend Time to File Brief filed by Appellant Jesse Franklin Swartz. [Entered: 10/30/2025 01:58 PM] |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Stay Proceedings in this Court filed by Appellant Jesse Franklin Swartz. [Entered: 10/30/2025 01:57 PM] |
| Filing 3 TERMINATED participation of Counsel for Appellant Elizabeth Richardson-Royer, representing Appellant Jesse Franklin Swartz. [Entered: 10/22/2025 01:58 PM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Sentence Imposed: N/A. Appeal Transcript Order Due (Appellant) 10/30/2025, Appeal Transcript Due (Appellant) 12/1/2025, Appeal Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 1/8/2026, Appeal Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 2/9/2026. For appeal no. 25-6643, 3:23-cr-00085-WHA-1. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule may result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1 [COURT UPDATE: resending case opening information to pro se appellant] [Entered: 10/21/2025 03:03 PM] [Edited: 10/22/2025 01:59 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 3:23-cr-00085-WHA-1 has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-6643 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 10/21/2025 02:59 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
