Walsh v. Martin, et al.
Plaintiff: MARK WALSH
Defendant: BOB MARTIN, Director of operations and maintenance facilities, LAURES STILES, Director of human resources and administration, CHAUNCEY LEE, Operations and maintenance manager and SAN LUIS & DELTA-MENDOTA WATER AUTHORITY
Case Number: 25-6697
Filed: October 22, 2025
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 20, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 20, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER FILED. Pursuant to the parties stipulation (Docket Entry No. 7), this appeal is dismissed. See Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). This order serves as the mandate of the court. [Entered: 01/20/2026 01:45 PM]
January 13, 2026 Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Appellant Mark Walsh. [Entered: 01/13/2026 05:46 PM]
January 13, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief (DE 5) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 2/11/2026, Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 3/13/2026, Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1.. [Entered: 01/13/2026 11:16 AM]
January 12, 2026 Filing 5 Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief filed by Appellant Mark Walsh. [Entered: 01/12/2026 04:49 PM]
October 28, 2025 Filing 4 RELEASED FROM MEDIATION (text only). This case is released from the Mediation Program. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. [Entered: 10/28/2025 01:13 PM]
October 27, 2025 Filing 3 MEDIATION QUESTIONNAIRE filed by Appellant Mark Walsh. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please email #[email protected] and include the case name and number in the subject line. Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts. [Entered: 10/27/2025 10:27 AM]
October 22, 2025 Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Mediation Questionnaire due (Appellant) 10/27/2025, Appeal Transcript Order Due (Appellant) 11/3/2025, Appeal Transcript Due (Appellant) 12/3/2025, Appeal Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 1/12/2026, Appeal Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 2/11/2026. For appeal no. 25-6697, 1:23-cv-01774-KJM-BAM. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 10/22/2025 04:45 PM]
October 22, 2025 Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 1:23-cv-01774-KJM-BAM has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-6697 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 10/22/2025 04:41 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Walsh v. Martin, et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: MARK WALSH
Represented By: Mr. Kevin Gerard Little
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BOB MARTIN, Director of operations and maintenance facilities
Represented By: Golnar Jabbari Fozi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: LAURES STILES, Director of human resources and administration
Represented By: Golnar Jabbari Fozi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CHAUNCEY LEE, Operations and maintenance manager
Represented By: Golnar Jabbari Fozi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SAN LUIS & DELTA-MENDOTA WATER AUTHORITY
Represented By: Golnar Jabbari Fozi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?