Mitchell v. CDCR Director, et al.
Petitioner: KENYATTA Q. MITCHELL
Respondent: WARDEN, CDCR DIRECTOR and CHRISTIAN PFIEFFER, named as C. Pfieffer
Case Number: 25-67
Filed: January 6, 2025
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 24, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 24, 2025 Filing 8 NOTICE of change of address filed by Appellant Kenyatta Q. Mitchell. [Entered: 02/24/2025 03:12 PM]
January 24, 2025 Filing 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Appellant Kenyatta Q. Mitchell. [Entered: 01/27/2025 10:20 AM]
January 14, 2025 Filing 6 DOCUMENT SENT. Sent Appellant a copy of the docket sheet and the FRAP and Ninth Circuit rules in response to the Form 29 request filed on 01/10/2025. [Entered: 01/14/2025 09:10 AM]
January 10, 2025 Filing 5 REQUEST for Public Information filed by Appellant Kenyatta Q. Mitchell. [Entered: 01/13/2025 04:35 PM]
January 10, 2025 Filing 4 Miscellaneous Pro Se Filings Filed [Entered: 01/13/2025 04:33 PM]
January 10, 2025 Filing 3 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel filed by Appellant Kenyatta Q. Mitchell. [Entered: 01/13/2025 04:26 PM]
January 6, 2025 Filing 2 COA SCHEDULE NOTICE. Needs a certificate of appealability. Date COA denied in DC: 12/05/2024. [Entered: 01/06/2025 11:51 AM]
January 6, 2025 Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 3:24-cv-01080-AJB-BJC has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-67 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 01/06/2025 11:47 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Mitchell v. CDCR Director, et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: KENYATTA Q. MITCHELL
Represented By: Kenyatta Q. Mitchell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: WARDEN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: CDCR DIRECTOR
Represented By: Mr. Daniel Rogers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: CHRISTIAN PFIEFFER, named as C. Pfieffer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?