Kpou v. Ramos, et al.
Plaintiff: ARMSTRONG KPOU
Defendant: ALFRED RAMOS, Deputy Warden at ASPC Eyman, FRANSISCO HERNANDEZ, SSU Sgt. at ASPC Eyman and MIA BALDENEGRO, SSU COII at ASPC Eyman
Case Number: 25-6847
Filed: October 29, 2025
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 21, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 21, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER FILED. The motion (Docket Entry No. 3) for voluntary dismissal is granted. See Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). This case is dismissed. This order serves as the mandate of the court. [Entered: 11/21/2025 03:45 PM]
November 20, 2025 Filing 3 MOTION to Withdraw Party Filing filed by Appellant Armstrong Kpou. [Entered: 11/20/2025 11:26 AM]
October 29, 2025 Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 12/8/2025, Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 1/7/2026. For appeal no. 25-6847, 2:23-cv-02401-ROS-ESW. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 10/29/2025 01:11 PM]
October 29, 2025 Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:23-cv-02401-ROS-ESW has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-6847 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 10/29/2025 01:06 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Kpou v. Ramos, et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ARMSTRONG KPOU
Represented By: Armstrong Kpou
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ALFRED RAMOS, Deputy Warden at ASPC Eyman
Represented By: Ms. Nancy J. Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: FRANSISCO HERNANDEZ, SSU Sgt. at ASPC Eyman
Represented By: Ms. Nancy J. Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MIA BALDENEGRO, SSU COII at ASPC Eyman
Represented By: Ms. Nancy J. Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?