Ellington, et al. v. Brar, et al.
| AZARIAH M. ELLINGTON and MITCHELL D. ELLINGTON |
| VIKRAM BRAR and ROBERT WADA |
| 25-6962 |
| November 4, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 29, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER FILED. SILVERMAN, TALLMAN, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges. The late motion (Docket Entry No. 6) for reconsideration is denied. See 9th Cir. R. 27-10. No further filings will be entertained in this closed case. [Entered: 04/29/2026 02:59 PM]
|
| Filing 8 SUPPLEMENT to MOTION to Clarify or Amend Court Order or Disposition (DE 6) filed by Appellant Azariah M. Ellington, Appellant Mitchell D. Ellington. [Entered: 02/02/2026 03:03 PM] |
| Filing 7 SUPPLEMENT to MOTION to Clarify or Amend Court Order or Disposition (DE 6) filed by Appellant Azariah M. Ellington, Appellant Mitchell D. Ellington. [Entered: 01/05/2026 02:15 PM] [Edited: 01/05/2026 02:58 PM] |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Clarify or Amend Court Order or Disposition filed by Appellant Azariah M. Ellington. [Entered: 12/12/2025 12:30 PM] |
|
Filing 5
ORDER FILED. (Barry G. SILVERMAN, Richard C. TALLMAN, Patrick J. BUMATAY). This court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the orders challenged in the notice of appeal are not final or immediately appealable. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; Religious Tech. Ctr. v. Scott, 869 F.2d 1306 (9th Cir. 1989) (denial of temporary restraining order is appealable only if the denial is tantamount to the denial of a preliminary injunction); see also Flam v. Flam, 788 F.3d 1043, 1046 (9th Cir. 2015) (magistrate judge may hear and determine non-dispositive matters under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A)). This appeal is therefore dismissed. See 9th Cir. R. 3-6(b) (if court determines it lacks jurisdiction, court may dismiss appeal without notice or further proceedings). All pending motions are denied as moot. DISMISSED. [Entered: 11/24/2025 02:16 PM]
|
| Filing 4 MOTION for Injunctive Relief filed by Appellant Azariah M. Ellington. [Entered: 11/18/2025 11:56 AM] |
| Filing 3 Amended Notice of Appeal Received. [Entered: 11/13/2025 12:00 PM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 12/16/2025. For appeal no. 25-6962, 2:25-cv-07317-SVW-DTB. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 11/04/2025 01:49 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:25-cv-07317-SVW-DTB has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-6962 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 11/04/2025 01:32 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
