Rong v. State of Arizona, et al.
| YI RONG, on behalf of C.R.C |
| STATE OF ARIZONA, HELENA SEYMOUR, KENDRICK WILSON, JAVIER CHON-LOPEZ, PIMA OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ATTORNEY, PIMA COUNTY JUSTICE COURT, PIMA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, DANIELLE JK CONSTANT, ANN HARALAMBIE, CONG CAO, MARK HOTCHKISS, FABIAN E. PACHECO, RYAN GANT, ALEXIS GALLEGO, ALEX LAMBDIN, VICTORIA OTTO, JACOB AMARU, ALICIA PELLEGRIN, C. JOY ELKINS, CHRISTINA MUIR and SCOTT MCDONALD |
| 25-6979 |
| November 4, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 12, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 MANDATE ISSUED Barry G. SILVERMAN, Richard C. TALLMAN, Patrick J. BUMATAY. The judgment of this Court, entered 11/20/2025, takes effect this date. [Entered: 12/12/2025 09:16 AM] |
Filing 4
ORDER FILED. (Barry G. SILVERMAN, Richard C. TALLMAN, Patrick J. BUMATAY) A district courts dismissal order is not final or immediately appealable under 28 U.S.C. 1291 unless it disposes of all claims as to all parties or unless judgment is entered in compliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b). Romoland Sch. Dist. v. Inland Empire Energy Ctr., LLC, 548 F.3d 738, 747 (9th Cir. 2008) (citing Chacon v. Babcock, 640 F.2d 221, 222 (9th Cir. 1981)). [A] plaintiff, who has been given leave to amend, may not file a notice of appeal simply because he does not choose to file an amended complaint. A further district court determination must be obtained. WMX Techs., Inc. v. Miller, 104 F.3d 1133, 1136 (9th Cir. 1997); see also 28 U.S.C. 1291. This court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the October 21, 2025 order granted leave to amend some claims. This appeal is therefore dismissed. See 9th Cir. R. 3-6(b) (if court determines it lacks jurisdiction, court may dismiss appeal without notice or further proceedings). DISMISSED. [Entered: 11/20/2025 03:36 PM]
|
| Filing 3 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Appellant Yi Rong. [Entered: 11/14/2025 12:15 PM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 12/15/2025. For appeal no. 25-6979, 4:25-cv-00351-JGZ-LCK. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 11/04/2025 03:33 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 4:25-cv-00351-JGZ-LCK has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-6979 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 11/04/2025 03:29 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
