Byerly v. United States of America, et al.
| NATHAN B. BYERLY |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF IDAHO, IDAHO COMMISSION OF PARDONS AND PAROLE, IDAHO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ADA COUNTY, CITY OF BOISE, MIKE MATTHEWS, JANICE DRESSEN, U.S. Marshal PATRICK MCDONALD, JERRY KIRKHAM, MICHAEL ROSS, SCOTT SMITH, BRAD LITTLE, JOSH TEWALT, RANDY VALLEY, AMANDA K. BRAILSFORD, DISTRICT JUDGE, LARISSA PFEIFER, N.H. AJITA, DERRICK BEER, TINA TRANSUE, ASHLEY R. SPORER, CHAD PAGE, KIM BROWN, BRIAN UNDERWOOD, JACOB ROGERS, COLIN DEVRIES, PAISLEY HOLMES, ROMAN CARRILLO, TRENT TRIPPLE and ERIC ROWELL |
| 25-6982 |
| November 4, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Prisoner-Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 14, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER FILED. Appellant has not filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis or proof that fees were paid to the district court, as ordered by this court on December 15, 2025. This appeal is therefore dismissed. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. This order becomes the mandate of the court in 21 days. [Entered: 01/14/2026 11:22 AM]
|
| Filing 12 Miscellaneous pro se filings received from Appellant Nathan B. Byerly. [Entered: 01/04/2026 11:40 AM] |
| Filing 11 MOTION for Miscellaneous Relief filed by Appellant Nathan B. Byerly. [Entered: 01/04/2026 11:29 AM] |
|
Filing 10
ORDER FILED. The district court entered a final judgment on October 9, 2025. Appellants motion (Docket Entry No. 5) for summary dismissal seeks voluntary dismissal of this appeal without prejudice. The motion is denied because an appeal that is dismissed voluntarily may not be reinstated at will. Appellant may file a new motion for voluntary dismissal of the appeal that complies with Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b), and does not specify without prejudice. See Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). The fees for this appeal are overdue. Within 21 days, appellant must pay $605 to the district court and file proof of payment in this court or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. If appellant does not do so, the court will dismiss this appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. Briefing is stayed. The clerk will serve a form motion for voluntary dismissal and a Form 4 on appellant. [Entered: 12/15/2025 02:46 PM]
|
| Filing 9 DOCUMENT SENT. Sent: Plaintiff/Appellant Nathan Byerly case opening & packet docket sheet, per request. [Entered: 11/24/2025 01:01 PM] |
| Filing 8 DOCUMENT SENT. Pro Se Case Opening Packet with forms (too large to attach). DUPLICATE OF DE 9. [Entered: 11/24/2025 12:59 PM] [Edited: 11/26/2025 09:30 AM] |
| Filing 7 Amended Notice of Appeal Received. [Entered: 11/20/2025 09:05 AM] |
| Filing 6 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Appellant Nathan B. Byerly. [Entered: 11/19/2025 04:16 PM] |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Summary Disposition filed by Appellant Nathan B. Byerly. [Entered: 11/19/2025 04:15 PM] |
| Filing 4 On November 13, 2025, the court issued a global order resetting the non-jurisdictional filing deadlines for federally funded attorneys (including FPDs and CJA counsel), that had been stayed by the courts October 1, 2025 Supplemental Administrative Order. If your deadlines were suspended by the October 1 Administrative Order, please review the #Order Resetting Deadlines, available on the courts website, to find your new deadlines. [Entered: 11/14/2025 04:58 PM] |
| Filing 3 REQUEST for Public Information filed by Appellant Nathan B. Byerly. [Entered: 11/12/2025 04:15 PM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 12/15/2025. For appeal no. 25-6982, 1:25-cv-00425-DCN. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 11/04/2025 03:52 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 1:25-cv-00425-DCN has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-6982 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 11/04/2025 03:48 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
