Oakes v. Gannett Media Corporation
| NICHOLAS PHILIP OAKES |
| GANNETT MEDIA CORPORATION |
| 25-7046 |
| November 6, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Prisoner Petitions - Civil Detainee |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 16, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 CLERK ACTION: Opening Brief submitted at DE 7 and Excerpts of Record submitted at DE 8 by Appellant Nicholas Philip Oakes are filed. Originals + 0 copies. [Entered: 03/16/2026 10:49 AM] |
| Filing 8 EXCERPTS OF RECORD submitted for filing by Appellant Nicholas Philip Oakes. [Entered: 03/16/2026 10:48 AM] |
| Filing 7 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Nicholas Philip Oakes. [Entered: 03/16/2026 10:45 AM] |
Filing 6
ORDER FILED. Richard A. PAEZ, Holly A. THOMAS The motion (Docket Entry No. 5) for appointment of pro bono counsel is denied. The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. [Entered: 01/26/2026 03:42 PM]
|
| Filing 5 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel filed by Appellant Nicholas Philip Oakes. [Entered: 12/22/2025 12:47 PM] |
|
Filing 4
ORDER FILED. The motion (Docket Entry No. 3) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. The opening brief is due March 16, 2026. There is no appearance by appellee, so briefing will be complete when the opening brief is filed. [Entered: 12/15/2025 03:04 PM]
|
| Filing 3 MOTION to Extend Time to File Brief filed by Appellant Nicholas Philip Oakes. [Entered: 12/10/2025 02:30 PM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 12/16/2025. For appeal no. 25-7046, 2:25-cv-01286-KML--JZB. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 11/06/2025 02:25 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:25-cv-01286-KML--JZB has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-7046 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 11/06/2025 02:21 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Oakes v. Gannett Media Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: NICHOLAS PHILIP OAKES | |
| Represented By: | Nicholas Philip Oakes |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: GANNETT MEDIA CORPORATION | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
