Storm v. McClusky, et al.
| RICK STORM and Rickie Storm |
| DAVID MCCLUSKY, Idaho Board of Corrections, DODDS HAYDEN, Idaho Board of Corrections, KAREN NEILL, Idaho Board of Corrections, JOSH TEWALT, Director of Idaho Department of Corrections, RONA SIEGERT, RN Idaho Dept. of Correction Health Services Director, RANDY VALLEY, Warden Idaho State Correctional Center, RADHA SADACHARAN, Regional Medical Director Centurion Medical, KAREN BOYER, Health Services Administrators, Centurion Medical Corp., Ms. JOHNSON, Health Service Administrator, South Boise Womens Correctional Center, KASEY HOLMES, Director of Nursing, Centurion Medical Corp, SHANNON CHAPEL, Centurion Medical Corp., HEATHER CROSSLEY, Nurse Practitioner, Centurion Medical Corporation and CENTURION OF IDAHO, LLC, Boise, ID |
| 25-7099 |
| November 10, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Prisoner-Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 20, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 MANDATE ISSUED Barry G. SILVERMAN, Richard A. PAEZ, Holly A. THOMAS. The judgment of this Court, entered 1/29/2026, takes effect this date. [Entered: 02/20/2026 09:14 AM] |
Filing 9
ORDER FILED. (Barry G. SILVERMAN, Richard A. PAEZ, Holly A. THOMAS) After considering the responses to the courts December 11, 2025 order, we deny the motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Docket Entry No. 2) and dismiss this appeal as frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a), (e)(2). All other pending motions are denied as moot. No further filings will be entertained in this closed case. DISMISSED. [Entered: 01/29/2026 09:47 AM]
|
| Filing 8 REPLY to Response to Court Order (DE 6) filed by Appellee Josh Tewalt, Appellee Randy Valley, Appellee Centurion of Idaho, LLC. [Entered: 01/12/2026 12:11 PM] |
| Filing 7 REPLY to Response to Court Order (DE 6) filed by Appellee Rona Siegert. [Entered: 01/08/2026 10:38 AM] |
| Filing 6 RESPONSE to Order - Order to Show Cause (OSC) (DE 5) filed by Appellant Rick Storm. [Entered: 01/07/2026 11:35 AM] |
|
Filing 5
ORDER FILED. It appears that this appeal may be frivolous. If the appeal is frivolous, the court will deny permission to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days, appellant must: (1) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous, OR (2) file a motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). If appellant files a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous, or any other response other than a motion to dismiss, the court will determine whether the appeal is frivolous. If it is frivolous, the appeal will be dismissed. If it is not frivolous, the appeal will proceed. If the court dismisses the appeal as frivolous, this appeal may be counted as a strike under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). If appellant files a statement that the appeal should go forward, appellees may file a response within 10 days after service of appellants statement. Briefing is stayed. If appellant does not respond to this order, the court may dismiss this appeal without further notice. The clerk will serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, and (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward. [Entered: 12/11/2025 04:00 PM]
|
| Filing 4 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 12/24/2025, Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 1/23/2026. For appeal no. 25-7099, 1:23-cv-00502-BLW. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 11/14/2025 04:27 PM] |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel filed by Appellant Rick Storm. [Entered: 11/12/2025 02:06 PM] |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Appellant Rick Storm. [Entered: 11/12/2025 02:05 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 1:23-cv-00502-BLW has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-7099 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 11/10/2025 11:40 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
