Baker v. Avenue5 Residential, et al.
Plaintiff: JUSTIN BAKER
Defendant: AVENUE5 RESIDENTIAL, Property Management Company, SEATTLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, ANN DAVISON, City of Seattle Attorney's Office, WASHINGTON STATE HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION, HUD state equivalency, Fair Housing Act Investigator and SEATTLE OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY
Case Number: 25-710
Filed: February 3, 2025
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 31, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 31, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER FILED. (Barry G. SILVERMAN, Bridget S. BADE, Ana DE ALBA) This court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the orders challenged in the notice of appeal are not final or immediately appealable. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; Religious Tech. Ctr. v. Scott, 869 F.2d 1306 (9th Cir. 1989) (denial of temporary restraining order is appealable only if the denial is tantamount to the denial of a preliminary injunction); see also Wilborn v. Escalderon, 789 F.2d 1328, 1330 (9th Cir. 1986) (denial of appointment of counsel in civil case is not appealable); Branson v. City of Los Angeles, 912 F.2d 334, 336 (9th Cir. 1990) (denial of reconsideration of non-appealable order is itself not appealable). This appeal is therefore dismissed. See 9th Cir. R. 3-6(b) (if court determines it lacks jurisdiction, court may dismiss appeal without notice or further proceedings). All pending motions are denied as moot. DISMISSED. [Entered: 03/31/2025 11:51 AM]
March 4, 2025 Filing 8 Emergency MOTION Circuit Rule 27-3 Certificate filed by Appellant Justin Baker. [Entered: 03/04/2025 05:44 AM]
March 4, 2025 Filing 7 MOTION for Injunctive Relief filed by Appellant Justin Baker. [Entered: 03/04/2025 05:27 AM]
February 25, 2025 Filing 6 SUPPLEMENT to Motion to Amend Case Caption (DE 5) filed by Appellant Justin Baker. [Entered: 02/25/2025 04:34 PM]
February 25, 2025 Filing 5 MOTION to Amend Case Caption filed by Appellant Justin Baker. [Entered: 02/25/2025 04:12 PM]
February 25, 2025 Filing 4 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Justin Baker. [Entered: 02/25/2025 03:26 PM]
February 25, 2025 Filing 3 MOTION to File Oversized Brief filed by Appellant Justin Baker. [Entered: 02/25/2025 03:22 PM]
February 3, 2025 Filing 2 PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION SCHEDULE NOTICE. Preliminary Injunction Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 3/3/2025. For appeal no. 25-710, 2:24-cv-01862-JHC.All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 02/03/2025 04:42 PM]
February 3, 2025 Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:24-cv-01862-JHC has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-710 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 02/03/2025 04:40 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Baker v. Avenue5 Residential, et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JUSTIN BAKER
Represented By: Justin Baker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: AVENUE5 RESIDENTIAL, Property Management Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SEATTLE POLICE DEPARTMENT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ANN DAVISON, City of Seattle Attorney's Office
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: WASHINGTON STATE HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION, HUD state equivalency, Fair Housing Act Investigator
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SEATTLE OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?