Hayden, et al. v. County of Alameda, et al.
| ALISON A. HAYDEN, MINDY PECHENUK, CINDY MARIA ROCHA, GERALD PECHENUK, MARK ZULIM, HUNTER COBB, JACQUELINE SUZANNE CARRON-COTA and JOHN LEON GUERRERO |
| COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, LOLITA FRANCISCO, TIM DUPUIS, CYNTHIA CORNEJO, JEFF NORMENT, RAYMOND S. LARA, DONALD HEARD, DELANA BELL, WILLIS BOOKER, GREGORY AHERN, YESENIA SANCHEZ, NATE MILEY, KEITH CARSON, DAVID HAUBERT, SUSAN MURANISHI, DONNA ZIEGLER, SHIRLEY WEBER, ALAMEDA COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE and CALIFORNIA SECRETARY OF STATE |
| 25-7134 |
| November 12, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 16, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 MANDATE ISSUED Barry G. SILVERMAN, Richard C. TALLMAN, Patrick J. BUMATAY. The judgment of this Court, entered 11/21/2025, takes effect this date. [Entered: 12/16/2025 11:30 AM] |
| Filing 10 Miscellaneous Pro Se Filings Filed [Entered: 11/26/2025 02:18 PM] |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Amend Case Caption filed by Appellant Alison A. Hayden. [Entered: 11/24/2025 04:23 PM] |
| Filing 8 Amended Notice of Appeal Received. [Entered: 11/24/2025 04:21 PM] |
Filing 7
ORDER FILED. (Barry G. SILVERMAN, Richard C. TALLMAN, Patrick J. BUMATAY) The notice of appeal was filed more than 60 days after the district court entered judgment on May 28, 2025. See 28 U.S.C. 2107(b); United States v. Sadler, 480 F.3d 932, 937 (9th Cir. 2007) (requirement of timely notice of appeal is jurisdictional). This appeal is therefore dismissed. All pending motions are denied as moot. DISMISSED. [Entered: 11/21/2025 04:14 PM]
|
| Filing 6 SUPPLEMENT to Motion to Dismiss (DE 5) filed by Appellee County of Alameda, Appellee Tim Dupuis, Appellee Cynthia Cornejo, Appellee Jeff Norment, Appellee Raymond S. Lara, Appellee Donald Heard, Appellee Delana Bell, Appellee Willis Booker, Appellee Gregory Ahern, Appellee Yesenia Sanchez, Appellee Nate Miley, Appellee Keith Carson, Appellee David Haubert, Appellee Susan Muranishi, Appellee Donna Ziegler, Appellee Alameda County Sheriff's Office. [Entered: 11/19/2025 02:26 PM] |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Appellee County of Alameda, Appellee Tim Dupuis, Appellee Cynthia Cornejo, Appellee Jeff Norment, Appellee Raymond S. Lara, Appellee Donald Heard, Appellee Delana Bell, Appellee Willis Booker, Appellee Gregory Ahern, Appellee Yesenia Sanchez, Appellee Nate Miley, Appellee Keith Carson, Appellee David Haubert, Appellee Susan Muranishi, Appellee Donna Ziegler, Appellee Alameda County Sheriff's Office. [Court entered filing to correct DE 4] [Entered: 11/19/2025 01:58 PM] |
| Filing 4 DEFECTIVE---STATUS REPORT filed by Appellee County of Alameda, Appellee Tim Dupuis, Appellee Cynthia Cornejo, Appellee Jeff Norment, Appellee Raymond S. Lara, Appellee Donald Heard, Appellee Delana Bell, Appellee Willis Booker, Appellee Gregory Ahern, Appellee Yesenia Sanchez, Appellee Nate Miley, Appellee Keith Carson, Appellee David Haubert, Appellee Susan Muranishi, Appellee Donna Ziegler, Appellee Alameda County Sheriff's Office. [Wrong filing type, corrected in DE 5] [Entered: 11/19/2025 01:47 PM] [Edited: 11/19/2025 02:00 PM] |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Appellant Alison A. Hayden. [Entered: 11/18/2025 02:39 PM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 12/24/2025, Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 1/26/2026. For appeal no. 25-7134, 4:23-cv-02833-KAW. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 11/12/2025 02:15 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 4:23-cv-02833-KAW has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-7134 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 11/12/2025 01:36 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
