Koroma v. Mayes, et al.
| KONBEH KOROMA |
| RACHEL MITCHELL, MEGAN MANNING, AARON HARDER, COUNTY OF MARICOPA, STATE OF ARIZONA, RUSSELL VOSSBRINK, Supervisor at Department of Public Safety Central Regional Crime Lab, RONALD SKWARTZ, Forensic Scientist at Department of Public Safety Central Regional Crime Lab and KRISTIN MAYES |
| 25-7158 |
| November 13, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Prisoner-Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 13, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 MANDATE ISSUED John B. OWENS, Eric D. MILLER, Patrick J. BUMATAY. The judgment of this Court, entered 3/20/2026, takes effect this date. [Entered: 04/13/2026 02:26 PM] |
Filing 14
ORDER FILED. (John B. OWENS, Eric D. MILLER, Patrick J. BUMATAY) After considering the response to the courts January 6, 2026 order and the opening brief, we deny the motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Docket Entry No. 9) and dismiss this appeal as frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a), (e)(2). No further filings will be entertained in this closed case. DISMISSED. [Entered: 03/20/2026 10:27 AM]
|
| Filing 13 RESPONSE to Order - Order to Show Cause (OSC) (DE 12) filed by Appellant Konbeh Koroma. [Entered: 02/06/2026 11:39 AM] |
|
Filing 12
ORDER FILED. It appears that this appeal may be frivolous. If the appeal is frivolous, the court will deny permission to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days, appellant must: (1) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous, OR (2) file a motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). If appellant files a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous, or any other response other than a motion to dismiss, the court will determine whether the appeal is frivolous. If it is frivolous, the appeal will be dismissed. If it is not frivolous, the appeal will proceed. If the court dismisses the appeal as frivolous, this appeal may be counted as a strike under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). If appellant files a statement that the appeal should go forward, appellees may file a response within 10 days after service of appellants statement. Briefing is stayed. If appellant does not respond to this order, the court may dismiss this appeal without further notice. The clerk will serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, and (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward. [Entered: 01/06/2026 03:45 PM]
|
| Filing 11 CLERK ACTION: Opening Brief submitted at DE 10 by Appellant Konbeh Koroma is filed. [Entered: 12/23/2025 09:26 AM] |
| Filing 10 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Konbeh Koroma. [Entered: 12/23/2025 09:25 AM] |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Appellant Konbeh Koroma. [Entered: 12/23/2025 09:12 AM] |
|
Filing 8
ORDER FILED. . Response to Fee Order due (Appellant) 1/6/2026 [Entered: 12/09/2025 10:59 AM]
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Withdrawal as Counsel filed by Sean Mikel Moore. Counsel withdrawing on behalf of other attorney(s): No [[-]]. Party proceeding without counsel: No. [-]. [COURT ENTERED FILING to correct DE 6.] [Entered: 12/05/2025 10:03 AM] [Edited: 12/05/2025 10:05 AM] |
| Filing 6 DEFECTIVE---MOTION to Withdraw Party Filing filed by Appellee Kris Mayes, Appellee Rachel Mitchell, Appellee Megan Manning, Appellee Aaron Harder, Appellee County of Maricopa, Appellee State of Arizona, Appellee Russell Vossbrink, Appellee Ronald Skwartz. [Wrong filing type used, correct entry is DE 7.] [Entered: 12/05/2025 09:20 AM] [Edited: 12/05/2025 10:04 AM] |
| Filing 5 Amended Notice of Appeal Received. [Entered: 11/21/2025 12:55 PM] |
| Filing 4 ADDED Counsel for Appellee Sean Mikel Moore [Entered: 11/14/2025 11:58 AM] |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Sean Mikel Moore for Appellee Aaron Harder, Appellee County of Maricopa, Appellee Kris Mayes, Appellee Megan Manning, Appellee Rachel Mitchell, Appellee Ronald Skwartz, Appellee Russell Vossbrink, Appellee State of Arizona. [Entered: 11/14/2025 11:54 AM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 12/23/2025, Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 1/22/2026. For appeal no. 25-7158, 2:25-cv-00360-KML--MTM. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 11/13/2025 02:01 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:25-cv-00360-KML--MTM has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-7158 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 11/13/2025 01:58 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
