Lopez, et al. v. Apple Inc.
Plaintiff: FUMIKO LOPEZ, as guardian of A.L., a minor, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, JOHN TROY PAPPAS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and DAVID YACUBIAN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant: APPLE INC., a Delaware corporation
Appellant: POTTER HANDY THIRD PARTY OPT OUTS
Case Number: 25-7160
Filed: November 13, 2025
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Property Damage
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 25, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 25, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER FILED. The motion (Docket Entry No. 16) for voluntary dismissal is granted. See Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). This case is dismissed. All pending motions are denied as moot. This order serves as the mandate of the court. [Entered: 11/25/2025 01:10 PM]
November 25, 2025 Filing 17 RESPONSE to Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss (DE 16) filed by Appellee Fumiko Lopez, Appellee John Troy Pappas, Appellee David Yacubian. [Entered: 11/25/2025 08:27 AM]
November 24, 2025 Filing 16 MOTION to Voluntarily Dismiss filed by Appellant Potter Handy Third Party Opt Outs. [Entered: 11/24/2025 02:50 PM]
November 24, 2025 Filing 15 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Mark N. Todzo for Appellee David Yacubian, Appellee Fumiko Lopez, Appellee John Troy Pappas. [Entered: 11/24/2025 01:35 PM]
November 24, 2025 Filing 14 MEDIATION QUESTIONNAIRE filed by Appellee Fumiko Lopez, Appellee John Troy Pappas, Appellee David Yacubian. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please email #[email protected] and include the case name and number in the subject line. Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts. [Entered: 11/24/2025 10:30 AM]
November 24, 2025 Filing 13 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Joseph P. Guglielmo for Appellee David Yacubian, Appellee Fumiko Lopez, Appellee John Troy Pappas. [Entered: 11/24/2025 09:42 AM]
November 24, 2025 Filing 12 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Appellee Apple Inc.. [Entered: 11/24/2025 06:59 AM]
November 20, 2025 Filing 11 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Margaret C. MacLean for Appellee David Yacubian, Appellee Fumiko Lopez, Appellee John Troy Pappas. [Entered: 11/20/2025 10:43 AM]
November 20, 2025 Filing 10 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Erin Green Comite for Appellee David Yacubian, Appellee Fumiko Lopez, Appellee John Troy Pappas. [Entered: 11/20/2025 10:24 AM]
November 19, 2025 Filing 9 MOTION for Summary Disposition filed by Appellee Fumiko Lopez, Appellee John Troy Pappas, Appellee David Yacubian. [Entered: 11/19/2025 07:00 PM]
November 19, 2025 Filing 8 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Christian Levis for Appellee David Yacubian, Appellee Fumiko Lopez, Appellee John Troy Pappas. [Entered: 11/19/2025 02:19 PM]
November 19, 2025 Filing 7 ADDED Counsel for Appellee Aileen McGrath [Entered: 11/19/2025 01:48 PM]
November 19, 2025 Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Aileen McGrath for Appellee Apple Inc.. [Entered: 11/19/2025 12:17 PM]
November 19, 2025 Filing 5 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference, 12/11/2025, 11:00 a.m. PACIFIC Time. See order for instructions and details. [Entered: 11/19/2025 11:36 AM]
November 14, 2025 Filing 4 MEDIATION QUESTIONNAIRE filed by Appellant Potter Handy Third Party Opt Outs. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please email #[email protected] and include the case name and number in the subject line. Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts. [Entered: 11/14/2025 09:40 AM]
November 13, 2025 Filing 3 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Mediation Questionnaire due (Appellant) 11/18/2025, Appeal Transcript Order Due (Appellant) 11/26/2025, Appeal Transcript Due (Appellant) 12/26/2025, Appeal Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 2/4/2026, Appeal Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 3/6/2026. For appeal no. 25-7160, 4:19-cv-04577-JSW. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 11/13/2025 02:16 PM]
November 13, 2025 Filing 2 Large Party Case Management Order. For court efficiency and administration, the court has decided to process this case as a Large Party Case. The court uses this administrative process to open complex cases or those involving many parties. Instead of listing each individual objector-appellant on the docket, appellants will proceed under the grouping name of: Potter Handy Third Party Opt Outs, as described on the November 12, 2025 notice of appeal. On or before November 28, 2025, counsel for appellants must file a response to this court order that includes a listing of all appellants in this case, using the attached template provided by the court. The Clerks Office will also email appellants counsel a digital template for creating this list. The response to the court order filed on the docket must include a PDF version of the list. In addition to filing on the docket, appellants counsel must also email a digital version of the list to the Clerks Office at [email protected], and copy counsel for all appellees on the email. The Clerk will serve this order on the district court. [SEE ORDER FOR FULL DETAILS AND ATTACHMENT]. [Entered: 11/13/2025 02:13 PM]
November 13, 2025 Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 4:19-cv-04577-JSW has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-7160 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 11/13/2025 02:06 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Lopez, et al. v. Apple Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: FUMIKO LOPEZ, as guardian of A.L., a minor, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Represented By: Mr. Joseph P. Guglielmo
Represented By: Erin Green Comite
Represented By: Mr. John T. Jasnoch
Represented By: Christian Levis
Represented By: Ms. Andrea Farah
Represented By: Margaret C. MacLean
Represented By: Eric Somers
Represented By: Patrick R. Carey, Esq
Represented By: Mark N. Todzo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JOHN TROY PAPPAS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Represented By: Mr. Joseph P. Guglielmo
Represented By: Erin Green Comite
Represented By: Mr. John T. Jasnoch
Represented By: Christian Levis
Represented By: Ms. Andrea Farah
Represented By: Margaret C. MacLean
Represented By: Eric Somers
Represented By: Patrick R. Carey, Esq
Represented By: Mark N. Todzo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: DAVID YACUBIAN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Represented By: Mr. Joseph P. Guglielmo
Represented By: Erin Green Comite
Represented By: Mr. John T. Jasnoch
Represented By: Christian Levis
Represented By: Ms. Andrea Farah
Represented By: Margaret C. MacLean
Represented By: Eric Somers
Represented By: Patrick R. Carey, Esq
Represented By: Mark N. Todzo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellant: POTTER HANDY THIRD PARTY OPT OUTS
Represented By: Mr. Russell Clive Handy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: APPLE INC., a Delaware corporation
Represented By: Mr. Arturo Jorge Gonzalez
Represented By: Purvi Govindlal Patel
Represented By: Ms. Isabelle L. Ord
Represented By: Aileen McGrath
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?