United States of America v. Severns
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| NICHOLAS BENTON SEVERNS |
| 25-7217 |
| November 17, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 13, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 CLERK ACTION: Answering Brief submitted at DE 13 and Excerpts of Record submitted at DE 14 by Appellee United States of America are filed. No paper copies are required. [Entered: 05/13/2026 11:36 AM] |
Filing 16
ORDER FILED. The motion (Docket Entry No. 12) for an extension of time to file the answering brief is granted. The clerk will file the answering brief at Docket Entry No. 13. The optional reply brief is due 21 days after the date of this order. [Entered: 05/13/2026 10:26 AM]
|
| Filing 15 MOTION to Transmit Exhibit filed by Appellee United States of America. [Entered: 05/12/2026 02:41 PM] |
| Filing 14 EXCERPTS OF RECORD submitted for filing by Appellee United States of America. [Entered: 05/12/2026 02:39 PM] |
| Filing 13 ANSWERING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellee United States of America. [Entered: 05/12/2026 02:38 PM] |
| Filing 12 MOTION to Extend Time to File Brief filed by Appellee United States of America. [Entered: 05/11/2026 11:43 AM] |
|
Filing 11
ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief (DE 10) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 5/11/2026. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 04/09/2026 11:03 AM]
|
| Filing 10 Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief filed by Appellee United States of America. [Entered: 04/09/2026 10:42 AM] |
| Filing 9 CLERK ACTION: The Court sua sponte grants Appellant Nicholas Benton Severns a 1 day extension of time to file the opening brief, which was not timely submitted. Opening Brief submitted at DE 8 and Excerpts of Record submitted at DE 6 by Appellant Nicholas Benton Severns are filed. No paper copies are required. The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. [Entered: 03/12/2026 02:35 PM] |
| Filing 8 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Nicholas Benton Severns. [Entered: 03/12/2026 02:06 PM] |
| Filing 7 Presentence Report UNDER SEAL filed by Appellant Nicholas Benton Severns. [Entered: 03/11/2026 01:57 PM] |
| Filing 6 EXCERPTS OF RECORD submitted for filing by Appellant Nicholas Benton Severns.--[COURT UPDATE: Corrected PDF attached as of 3/12/2026, REPLACING original attachment] [Entered: 03/11/2026 01:56 PM] [Edited: 03/12/2026 02:26 PM] |
| Filing 5 DEFECTIVE --- OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Nicholas Benton Severns. (Incorrect entry, see DE ) [Entered: 03/11/2026 01:54 PM] [Edited: 03/12/2026 02:28 PM] |
|
Filing 4
ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief (DE 3) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 3/11/2026, Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 4/10/2026. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 02/06/2026 09:03 AM]
|
| Filing 3 Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief filed by Appellant Nicholas Benton Severns. [Entered: 02/06/2026 08:00 AM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Sentence Imposed: 38 Months. Appeal Transcript Order Due (Appellant) 12/1/2025, Appeal Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 2/9/2026, Appeal Transcript Due (Appellant) 12/31/2025, Appeal Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 3/11/2026. For appeal no. 25-7217, 4:24-cr-00089-BMM-1. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule may result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1 [Entered: 11/17/2025 02:09 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 4:24-cr-00089-BMM-1 has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-7217 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 11/17/2025 02:03 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: United States of America v. Severns | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Mr. Tim Tatarka |
| Represented By: | Bryan Timothy Dake |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: NICHOLAS BENTON SEVERNS | |
| Represented By: | Clark Mathews |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
