Yost v. Saldana Nunez, et al.
| CRAIG YOST |
| ESTHER SALDANA NUNEZ, TRACY D. FINNEGAN, Finnegan & Associates PLLC, STEPHANIE L. MCNULTY, Finnegan & Associates PLLC, LESLIE E. GILBERTSON, SNOHOMISH COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT and WASHINGTON DIVISION OF CHILD SUPPORT - TACOMA |
| 25-7286 |
| November 19, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 20, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 23 CLERK ACTION: Reply Brief submitted at DE 22 by Appellant Craig Yost is filed. No paper copies are required. [Entered: 04/20/2026 03:14 PM] |
| Filing 22 REPLY BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Craig Yost. [Entered: 04/19/2026 03:29 PM] |
| Filing 21 CLERK ACTION: Answering Brief submitted at DE 16 by Appellee Snohomish County Superior Court is filed. No paper copies are required. [Entered: 03/31/2026 02:38 PM] |
| Filing 20 CLERK ACTION: Answering Brief submitted at DE 18 and Excerpts of Record submitted at DE 19 by Appellees Leslie E. Gilbertson and Tracy D. Finnegan are filed. No paper copies are required. [Entered: 03/31/2026 02:11 PM] |
| Filing 19 EXCERPTS OF RECORD submitted for filing by Appellee Tracy D. Finnegan, Appellee Leslie E. Gilbertson. [Entered: 03/30/2026 11:39 PM] |
| Filing 18 ANSWERING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellee Tracy D. Finnegan, Appellee Leslie E. Gilbertson. [Entered: 03/30/2026 11:37 PM] |
| Filing 17 CLERK ACTION: Answering Brief submitted at DE 14 and Excerpts of Record submitted at DE 15 by Appellee Washington Division of Child Support - Tacoma are filed. No paper copies are required. [Entered: 03/30/2026 04:03 PM] |
| Filing 16 ANSWERING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellee Snohomish County Superior Court.--[COURT UPDATE: Corrected PDF attached as of 3/31/2026, REPLACING original attachment] [Entered: 03/30/2026 02:23 PM] [Edited: 03/31/2026 02:37 PM] |
| Filing 15 EXCERPTS OF RECORD submitted for filing by Appellee Washington Division of Child Support - Tacoma. [Entered: 03/30/2026 11:49 AM] |
| Filing 14 ANSWERING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellee Washington Division of Child Support - Tacoma. [Entered: 03/30/2026 11:46 AM] |
| Filing 13 TERMINATED participation of Counsel for Appellee Elizabeth Anne Olsen, representing Appellee Washington Division of Child Support - Tacoma. [Entered: 02/27/2026 10:43 AM] |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Withdrawal as Counsel filed by Elizabeth Anne Olsen. Counsel withdrawing on behalf of other attorney(s): No [[-]]. Party proceeding without counsel: No. [-]. [Entered: 02/27/2026 09:27 AM] |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Withdrawal as Counsel filed by Elizabeth Anne Olsen. Counsel withdrawing on behalf of other attorney(s): No [[-]]. Party proceeding without counsel: No. [-]. [Entered: 02/27/2026 09:26 AM] |
Filing 10
ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief (DE 9) granted FOR ALL APPELLEES. Amended briefing schedule: Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 3/30/2026. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 12/31/2025 03:01 PM]
|
| Filing 9 Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief filed by Appellee Snohomish County Superior Court. [Entered: 12/31/2025 01:49 PM] |
|
Filing 8
ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief (DE 7) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 2/27/2026. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 12/30/2025 01:45 PM]
|
| Filing 7 Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief filed by Appellee Washington Division of Child Support - Tacoma. [Entered: 12/30/2025 01:10 PM] |
| Filing 6 CLERK ACTION: Opening Brief submitted at DE 5 by Appellant Craig Yost is filed. No paper copies are required. [Entered: 12/15/2025 11:09 AM] |
| Filing 5 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Craig Yost. [Entered: 12/14/2025 02:40 AM] |
| Filing 4 ADDED Counsel for Appellee Joshua Schaer [Entered: 11/20/2025 04:09 PM] |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Joshua Schaer for Appellee Washington Division of Child Support - Tacoma. [Entered: 11/20/2025 03:10 PM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 1/28/2026, Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 12/29/2025. For appeal no. 25-7286, 2:25-cv-00918-JLR. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 11/19/2025 11:41 AM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:25-cv-00918-JLR has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-7286 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 11/19/2025 11:19 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
