Hannonen, et al. v. McCloskey, et al.
| LEENA HANNONEN and AGNES BRADSHAW |
| MARK MCCLOSKEY, TIMOTHY M. RYAN, ATTORNEY, formerly known as Doe 1, DOES, 5-25, ANDREW J. MASE, formerly known as Doe 2, MATTHEW H. AGUIRRE, ATTORNEY, formerly known as Doe 3 and RYAN FIRM, APC, formerly known as Doe 4 |
| 25-7322 |
| November 20, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Real Property Actions |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 8, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 19
ORDER FILED. The motion (Docket Entry No. 18) for leave to file an oversized reply brief is unnecessary. The reply brief has been filed. [Entered: 05/08/2026 09:22 AM]
|
| Filing 18 MOTION to File Oversized Brief filed by Appellant Leena Hannonen. [Entered: 05/04/2026 03:01 PM] |
| Filing 17 CLERK ACTION: Reply Brief submitted at DE 16 by Appellant Leena Hannonen is filed. No paper copies are required. [Entered: 05/04/2026 02:49 PM] |
| Filing 16 REPLY BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Leena Hannonen. [Entered: 05/04/2026 02:48 PM] |
| Filing 15 CLERK ACTION: Answering Brief and Excerpts of Record submitted at DE 11, DE 13 by Appellees Mark McCloskey, et al. are filed. No paper copies are required. [Entered: 04/14/2026 10:51 AM] |
| Filing 14 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Appellee Mark McCloskey, Appellee Timothy M. Ryan, Appellee Andrew J. Mase, Appellee Matthew H. Aguirre, Appellee Ryan Firm, APC. [Entered: 04/13/2026 04:25 PM] |
| Filing 13 EXCERPTS OF RECORD submitted for filing by Appellee Mark McCloskey, Appellee Timothy M. Ryan, Appellee Andrew J. Mase, Appellee Matthew H. Aguirre, Appellee Ryan Firm, APC. [Entered: 04/13/2026 04:22 PM] |
| Filing 12 DEFECTIVE --- PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Appellee Mark McCloskey, Appellee Timothy M. Ryan, Appellee Andrew J. Mase, Appellee Matthew H. Aguirre, Appellee Ryan Firm, APC. (Wrong filing type, correct entry at DE 11) [Entered: 04/13/2026 04:16 PM] [Edited: 04/14/2026 10:47 AM] |
| Filing 11 ANSWERING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellee Mark McCloskey, Appellee Timothy M. Ryan, Appellee Andrew J. Mase, Appellee Matthew H. Aguirre, Appellee Ryan Firm, APC.--[COURT UPDATE: PDF of Certificate of Service originally submitted at DE 12 and addendum attached as of 4/14/2026] [Entered: 04/13/2026 04:02 PM] [Edited: 04/14/2026 10:54 AM] |
|
Filing 10
ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief (DE 9) granted FOR ALL PARTIES. Amended briefing schedule: Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 4/13/2026. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 03/11/2026 01:57 PM]
|
| Filing 9 Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief filed by Appellee Mark McCloskey, Appellee Timothy M. Ryan, Appellee Andrew J. Mase, Appellee Matthew H. Aguirre, Appellee Ryan Firm, APC. [Entered: 03/11/2026 12:02 PM] |
| Filing 8 CLERK ACTION: Opening Brief submitted at DE 6 by Appellant Leena Hannonen is filed. [Entered: 02/10/2026 02:03 PM] |
|
Filing 7
ORDER FILED. The notice of errata (Docket Entry No. 5) is treated as a motion for leave to file a replacement opening brief and is granted. The clerk will strike the opening brief at Docket Entry No. 4 and file the replacement opening brief at Docket Entry No. 6. The answering brief is now due March 12, 2026. The optional reply brief is due 21 days after the answering brief is served. [Entered: 02/10/2026 01:53 PM]
|
| Filing 6 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Leena Hannonen. [Entered: 01/30/2026 03:38 PM] |
| Filing 5 MOTION to File Replacement Brief filed by Appellant Leena Hannonen.--[COURT ENTERED FILING to correct DE 3] [Entered: 01/30/2026 03:36 PM] |
| Filing 3 DEFECTIVE --- Miscellaneous pro se filings received from Appellant Leena Hannonen. (Wrong filing type, correct entry at DE 5) [Entered: 01/30/2026 02:17 PM] [Edited: 01/31/2026 07:48 AM] |
| Filing 4 STRICKEN PER ORDER [DE 7] -- OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Leena Hannonen. [Entered: 01/30/2026 03:32 PM] [Edited: 02/10/2026 01:54 PM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 1/29/2026, Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 12/30/2025. For appeal no. 25-7322, 3:24-cv-02408-BAS-BLM. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 11/20/2025 12:09 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 3:24-cv-02408-BAS-BLM has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-7322 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 11/20/2025 11:56 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
