Austin v. ABC Legal Services, LLC, et al.
Plaintiff: GEORGE JARVIS AUSTIN
Defendant: ABC LEGAL SERVICES, LLC, ALEX G. TSE, MAGISTRATE JUDGE, SUSAN ILLSTON, DISTRICT JUDGE, DONNA M. RYU, MAGISTRATE JUDGE, TRINA L. THOMPSON, DISTRICT JUDGE, EDWARD M. CHEN, DISTRICT JUDGE, RICHARD SEEBORG, CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE, SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG, MAXINE M. CHESNEY, DISTRICT JUDGE, WILLIAM H. ALSUP, EDWARD J. DAVILLA, YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS, DISTRICT JUDGE, RITA F. LIN, DISTRICT JUDGE, CHARLES R. BREYER, DISTRICT JUDGE and JAMES DONATO, DISTRICT JUDGE
Case Number: 25-734
Filed: February 4, 2025
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 4, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 4, 2025 Filing 56 MOTION to File Replacement Excerpts of Record filed by Appellant George Jarvis Austin. [Entered: 04/04/2025 02:49 AM]
April 4, 2025 Filing 55 EXCERPTS OF RECORD submitted for filing by Appellant George Jarvis Austin. [Entered: 04/04/2025 02:19 AM]
April 2, 2025 Filing 54 MOTION for Injunctive Relief filed by Appellant George Jarvis Austin. [Entered: 04/02/2025 03:46 PM]
April 2, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 53 ORDER FILED. Appellant's motion to refer to mediation (Docket Entry No. 51) is denied. [Entered: 04/02/2025 02:59 PM]
March 31, 2025 Filing 52 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Appellant George Jarvis Austin. [Entered: 03/31/2025 02:58 PM]
March 31, 2025 Filing 51 MOTION to Refer to Mediation filed by Appellant George Jarvis Austin. [Entered: 03/31/2025 12:43 AM]
March 30, 2025 Filing 50 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Appellant George Jarvis Austin. [Entered: 03/30/2025 05:14 AM]
March 30, 2025 Filing 49 SUPPLEMENT to Motion for Injunctive Relief (DE 47) filed by Appellant George Jarvis Austin. [Entered: 03/30/2025 04:59 AM]
March 30, 2025 Filing 48 SUPPLEMENT to Motion for Injunctive Relief (DE 47) filed by Appellant George Jarvis Austin. [Entered: 03/30/2025 01:15 AM]
March 29, 2025 Filing 47 MOTION for Injunctive Relief filed by Appellant George Jarvis Austin. [Entered: 03/29/2025 10:45 PM]
March 24, 2025 Filing 46 MOTION for Judicial Notice filed by Appellant George Jarvis Austin. [Entered: 03/24/2025 05:19 PM]
March 24, 2025 Filing 45 MOTION to Supplement or Correct Record filed by Appellant George Jarvis Austin. [Entered: 03/24/2025 02:11 PM]
March 21, 2025 Filing 44 Miscellaneous Pro Se Filings Filed. [Court entered filing to correct DE 43] [Entered: 03/24/2025 09:21 AM]
March 21, 2025 Filing 43 DEFECTIVE---PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Appellant George Jarvis Austin. [Wrong filing type, corrected in DE 44] [Entered: 03/21/2025 08:28 PM] [Edited: 03/24/2025 09:22 AM]
March 18, 2025 Filing 42 Miscellaneous Pro Se Filings Filed. [Court entered filing to correct DE 41] [Entered: 03/20/2025 01:20 PM]
March 18, 2025 Filing 41 DEFECTIVE---MOTION to Supplement or Correct Record filed by Appellant George Jarvis Austin. [Wrong filing type, corrected in DE 42] [Entered: 03/18/2025 06:45 PM] [Edited: 03/20/2025 01:21 PM]
March 18, 2025 Filing 39 EXCERPTS OF RECORD submitted for filing by Appellant George Jarvis Austin. [Entered: 03/18/2025 09:21 AM]
March 15, 2025 Filing 40 Miscellaneous Pro Se Filings Filed [Court entered filing to correct DE 38.] [Entered: 03/18/2025 04:00 PM]
March 15, 2025 Filing 38 DEFECTIVE - NOTICE of Transmission of Classified or Highly Sensitive Documents (HSD) [Wrong filing type used, corrected in DE 40.] [Entered: 03/15/2025 03:03 AM] [Edited: 03/18/2025 04:01 PM]
March 13, 2025 Filing 37 NOTICE of State Supreme Court Order/Decision filed by Appellant George Jarvis Austin. [Entered: 03/13/2025 05:10 AM]
March 11, 2025 Filing 36 NOTICE of State Supreme Court Order/Decision filed by Appellant George Jarvis Austin. [Entered: 03/11/2025 01:36 PM]
February 20, 2025 Filing 35 MOTION to Supplement or Correct Record filed by Appellant George Jarvis Austin. [Entered: 02/20/2025 12:45 PM]
February 18, 2025 Filing 34 CORRESPONDENCE filed by Appellant George Jarvis Austin. [Court entered filing to correct DE 32.] [Entered: 02/20/2025 12:42 PM]
February 18, 2025 Filing 33 Miscellaneous Pro Se Filings Filed [Court entered filing to correct DE 31.] [Entered: 02/20/2025 11:55 AM]
February 18, 2025 Filing 32 DEFECTIVE - MOTION for Judicial Notice filed by Appellant George Jarvis Austin. [Wrong filing type used, corrected in DE 34.] [Entered: 02/18/2025 05:01 PM] [Edited: 02/20/2025 12:44 PM]
February 18, 2025 Filing 31 DEFECTIVE - RESPONSE to Order - General OSC (DE 20) filed by Appellant George Jarvis Austin. [Wrong filing type used, corrected in DE 33.] [Entered: 02/18/2025 03:49 PM] [Edited: 02/20/2025 11:56 AM]
February 18, 2025 Filing 27 Amended Notice of Appeal Received. [Entered: 02/18/2025 10:42 AM]
February 16, 2025 Filing 30 Miscellaneous Pro Se Filings Filed [Court entered filing to correct DE 26.] [Entered: 02/18/2025 02:38 PM]
February 16, 2025 Filing 26 DEFECTIVE - SUPPLEMENT to Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (DE 12) filed by Appellant George Jarvis Austin. [Wrong filing type used, corrected in DE 30.] [Entered: 02/16/2025 07:35 PM] [Edited: 02/18/2025 02:40 PM]
February 16, 2025 Filing 25 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Appellant George Jarvis Austin. [Entered: 02/16/2025 07:31 PM]
February 14, 2025 Filing 24 MOTION for Judicial Notice filed by Appellant George Jarvis Austin. [Entered: 02/14/2025 11:06 AM]
February 13, 2025 Filing 29 Miscellaneous Pro Se Filings Filed [Court entered filing to correct DE 23.] [Entered: 02/18/2025 02:14 PM]
February 13, 2025 Filing 28 Miscellaneous Pro Se Filings Filed [Court entered filing to correct DE 22.] [Entered: 02/18/2025 01:54 PM]
February 13, 2025 Filing 23 DEFECTIVE - PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Appellant George Jarvis Austin. [Wrong filing type used, corrected in DE 29.] [Entered: 02/13/2025 09:22 PM] [Edited: 02/18/2025 02:16 PM]
February 13, 2025 Filing 22 DEFECTIVE - STATUS REPORT filed by Appellant George Jarvis Austin. [Wrong filing type used, corrected in DE 28.] [Entered: 02/13/2025 09:13 PM] [Edited: 02/18/2025 01:56 PM]
February 13, 2025 Filing 21 MOTION to Clarify or Amend Court Order or Disposition filed by Appellant George Jarvis Austin. [Entered: 02/13/2025 08:43 PM]
February 13, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER FILED. It appears that this appeal may be frivolous. If the appeal is frivolous, the court will deny permission to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days, appellant must: (1) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous, OR (2) file a motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). If appellant files a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous, or any other response other than a motion to dismiss, the court will determine whether the appeal is frivolous. If it is frivolous, the appeal will be dismissed. If it is not frivolous, the appeal will proceed. If appellant files a statement that the appeal should go forward, appellees may file a response within 10 days after service of appellants statement. Briefing is stayed. If appellant does not respond to this order, the court may dismiss this appeal without further notice. The clerk will serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, and (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward. [Entered: 02/13/2025 04:28 PM]
February 12, 2025 Filing 19 MOTION for Miscellaneous Relief filed by Appellant George Jarvis Austin. [Court entered filing to correct DE 15-motion to extend time to pay filing fee.] [Entered: 02/13/2025 12:33 PM]
February 12, 2025 Filing 18 MOTION for Miscellaneous Relief filed by Appellant George Jarvis Austin. [Court entered filing to correct DE 14.] [Entered: 02/13/2025 12:21 PM]
February 12, 2025 Filing 17 MOTION for Miscellaneous Relief filed by Appellant George Jarvis Austin. [Court entered filing to correct DE 13.] [Entered: 02/13/2025 11:17 AM]
February 12, 2025 Filing 16 SUPPLEMENT to Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (DE 12) filed by Appellant George Jarvis Austin. [Entered: 02/12/2025 06:02 PM]
February 12, 2025 Filing 15 DEFECTIVE - SUPPLEMENT to Motion to Extend Time to Respond to Court Order (DE 14) filed by Appellant George Jarvis Austin. [Wrong filing type used, corrected in DE 19.] [Entered: 02/12/2025 02:47 AM] [Edited: 02/13/2025 12:34 PM]
February 12, 2025 Filing 14 DEFECTIVE - MOTION to Extend Time to Respond to Court Order filed by Appellant George Jarvis Austin. [Wrong filing type used, corrected in DE 18.] [Entered: 02/12/2025 01:44 AM] [Edited: 02/13/2025 12:22 PM]
February 12, 2025 Filing 13 DEFECTIVE - MOTION for Clarification of Non-Dispositive Order filed by Appellant George Jarvis Austin. [Wrong filing type used, corrected in DE 17.] [Entered: 02/12/2025 01:13 AM] [Edited: 02/13/2025 11:18 AM]
February 12, 2025 Filing 12 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Appellant George Jarvis Austin. [Entered: 02/12/2025 12:01 AM]
February 11, 2025 Filing 11 MOTION for Judicial Notice filed by Appellant George Jarvis Austin. [Entered: 02/11/2025 03:06 AM]
February 11, 2025 Filing 10 MEDIATION QUESTIONNAIRE filed by Appellant George Jarvis Austin. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please email #[email protected] and include the case name and number in the subject line. Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts. [Entered: 02/11/2025 02:53 AM]
February 10, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief (DE 7) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 4/16/2025, Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 5/16/2025. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 02/10/2025 12:51 PM]
February 10, 2025 Filing 7 Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief filed by Appellant George Jarvis Austin. [Entered: 02/10/2025 11:54 AM]
February 8, 2025 Filing 6 DEFECTIVE - SUPPLEMENT to Motion to Amend Case Caption (DE 3) filed by Appellant George Jarvis Austin. [Wrong filing type used, corrected in DE 9.] [Entered: 02/07/2025 07:10 PM] [Edited: 02/10/2025 02:15 PM]
February 7, 2025 Filing 9 Miscellaneous Pro Se Filings Filed [Court entered filing to correct DE 6.] [Entered: 02/10/2025 02:14 PM]
February 6, 2025 Filing 5 NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT by Appellant George Jarvis Austin. [Entered: 02/06/2025 01:23 PM]
February 6, 2025 Filing 4 SUPPLEMENT to Motion to Amend Case Caption (DE 3) filed by Appellant George Jarvis Austin. [Entered: 02/05/2025 04:18 PM]
February 4, 2025 Filing 3 MOTION to Amend Case Caption filed by Appellant George Jarvis Austin. [Entered: 02/04/2025 10:22 PM]
February 4, 2025 Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 3/17/2025, Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 4/15/2025. For appeal no. 25-734, 3:24-cv-04185-WHO. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 02/04/2025 03:59 PM]
February 4, 2025 Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 3:24-cv-04185-WHO has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-734 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 02/04/2025 03:53 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Austin v. ABC Legal Services, LLC, et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: GEORGE JARVIS AUSTIN
Represented By: Mr. George Jarvis Austin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ABC LEGAL SERVICES, LLC
Represented By: Matthew S. Dente
Represented By: London Meservy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ALEX G. TSE, MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SUSAN ILLSTON, DISTRICT JUDGE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DONNA M. RYU, MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: TRINA L. THOMPSON, DISTRICT JUDGE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: EDWARD M. CHEN, DISTRICT JUDGE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: RICHARD SEEBORG, CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE
Represented By: Pamela Johann
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MAXINE M. CHESNEY, DISTRICT JUDGE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: WILLIAM H. ALSUP
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: EDWARD J. DAVILLA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS, DISTRICT JUDGE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: RITA F. LIN, DISTRICT JUDGE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CHARLES R. BREYER, DISTRICT JUDGE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JAMES DONATO, DISTRICT JUDGE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?