Sibley v. Jackson
| TEDDY ROOSEVELT SIBLEY |
| ROB JACKSON |
| 25-7345 |
| November 21, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 23, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER FILED. LEE, DESAI, and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges. Pending before the court are the applicants four applications for authorization to file second or successive 28 U.S.C. 2254 habeas corpus petitions: Case Nos. 25-7345, 25-7757, 26-664, and 26-952. Case Nos. 25-7345 and 26-664 were opened when the district court transferred, pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 22-3, the applicants 2254 petitions in United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington Case Nos. 2:25-cv-00425-MKD and 2:25-cv-00524-MKD, respectively. The applicant objects to these transfers, and he seeks to dismiss Case Nos. 25-7345 and 26-664. We treat the applicants requests as motions to withdraw Case Nos. 25-7345 and 26-664, and we grant the motions. These applications are deemed withdrawn. The applicants request (Docket Entry No. 5 filed in Case No. 25-7345) for a copy of the habeas petition transferred to this court is granted. The clerk will send the applicant a copy of Docket Entry No. 2 filed in Case No. 25-7345. The applications for authorization to file second or successive 2254 petitions in Case Nos. 25-7757 and 26-952, as supplemented, are denied. The applicant has not made a prima facie showing under 28 U.S.C. 2244(b)(2) that: (A) the claim relies on a new rule of constitutional law, made retroactive to cases on collateral review by the Supreme Court, that was previously unavailable; or (B)(i) the factual predicate for the claim could not have been discovered previously through the exercise of due diligence; and (ii) the facts underlying the claim, if proven and viewed in light of the evidence as a whole, would be sufficient to establish by clear and convincing evidence that, but for constitutional error, no reasonable factfinder would have found the applicant guilty of the underlying offense. Any pending motions are denied as moot. No further filings will be entertained in Case Nos. 25-7345, 25-7757, 26-664, and 26-952. Case Nos. 25-7345 and 26-664 are now closed. Case Nos. 25-7757 and 26-952 are DENIED. [25-7345, 25-7757, 26-664, 26-952] [Entered: 04/23/2026 04:53 PM]
|
| Filing 5 Miscellaneous Pro Se Filings Filed [Entered: 12/11/2025 03:32 PM] |
| Filing 4 SOS TRANSFER FROM EASTERN DISTRICT COURT OF WASHINGTON (SPOKANE) DOCKETING NOTICE. Application for Permission to File a Second or Successive Habeas Corpus Petition transferred to this Court, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (Ninth Circuit), from the district court has been opened and assigned the Ninth Circuit case number 25-7345. All subsequent correspondence regarding this matter will be added to your file to be considered at the same time the cause is brought before the court. The Ninth Circuit case number and the title of your case should be shown in the upper right corner of any correspondence to the clerk's office, and should be directed to the above address pursuant to Circuit Rule 25-1. [Entered: 11/21/2025 01:15 PM] |
| Filing 3 CASE OPENED. Your case opening documents have been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 11/19/2025. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-7345 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for assistance. [Entered: 11/21/2025 01:12 PM] |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to File 28 U.S.C. 2254 Second or Successive Petition. [Entered: 11/21/2025 01:10 PM] |
|
Filing 1
Order Transferring Case to Ninth Circuit from Other Court [Entered: 11/21/2025 01:10 PM]
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Sibley v. Jackson | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: TEDDY ROOSEVELT SIBLEY | |
| Represented By: | Teddy Roosevelt Sibley |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: ROB JACKSON | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
