California Coastkeeper Alliance v. Cosumnes Corporation, et al.
Plaintiff: CALIFORNIA COASTKEEPER ALLIANCE
Defendant: COSUMNES CORPORATION, Doing business as Murieta Equestrian Center and CAROL ANDERSON WARD, individually and as trustee of the Carol Anderson Ward Trust dated February 6, 2002
Case Number: 25-7486
Filed: November 28, 2025
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Environmental Matters
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 6, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 6, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER FILED. Pursuant to the parties stipulation (Docket Entry No. 13), this appeal is dismissed. See Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). This order serves as the mandate of the court. [Entered: 02/06/2026 10:45 AM]
February 2, 2026 Filing 13 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Appellant Cosumnes Corporation. [Entered: 02/02/2026 12:58 PM]
December 16, 2025 Filing 12 ADDED Counsel for Appellant Paul Emmanuel Salamanca [Entered: 12/16/2025 12:13 PM]
December 16, 2025 Filing 11 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Paul Emmanuel Salamanca for Appellant Cosumnes Corporation. [Entered: 12/16/2025 10:55 AM]
December 12, 2025 Filing 10 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Appellee California Coastkeeper Alliance. [Entered: 12/12/2025 06:15 PM]
December 12, 2025 Filing 9 RELEASED FROM MEDIATION (text only). This case is released from the Mediation Program. [Entered: 12/12/2025 01:13 PM]
December 12, 2025 Filing 8 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Appellant Cosumnes Corporation. [Entered: 12/12/2025 11:55 AM]
December 11, 2025 Filing 7 ADDED Counsel for Appellant Tracy Forbath [Entered: 12/11/2025 03:20 PM]
December 11, 2025 Filing 6 ADDED Counsel for Appellant Daniel Velladao [Entered: 12/11/2025 03:13 PM]
December 11, 2025 Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Tracy Forbath for Appellant Cosumnes Corporation. [Entered: 12/11/2025 01:04 PM]
December 11, 2025 Filing 4 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Daniel Velladao for Appellant Cosumnes Corporation. [Entered: 12/11/2025 12:56 PM]
December 2, 2025 Filing 3 MEDIATION QUESTIONNAIRE filed by Appellant Cosumnes Corporation. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please email #[email protected] and include the case name and number in the subject line. Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts. [Entered: 12/02/2025 03:28 PM]
November 28, 2025 Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Mediation Questionnaire due (Appellant) 12/3/2025, Appeal Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 2/13/2026, Appeal Transcript Order Due (Appellant) 12/5/2025, Appeal Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 3/16/2026, Appeal Transcript Due (Appellant) 1/5/2026. For appeal no. 25-7486, 2:20-cv-01703-SCR. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 11/28/2025 10:14 AM]
November 28, 2025 Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:20-cv-01703-SCR has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-7486 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 11/28/2025 10:09 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: California Coastkeeper Alliance v. Cosumnes Corporation, et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CALIFORNIA COASTKEEPER ALLIANCE
Represented By: Jason Robert Flanders
Represented By: Erica A. Maharg
Represented By: Mr. Drevet John Hunt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: COSUMNES CORPORATION, Doing business as Murieta Equestrian Center
Represented By: Tracy Forbath
Represented By: Daniel Velladao
Represented By: Mr. Stewart Douglas Fried
Represented By: Paul Emmanuel Salamanca
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CAROL ANDERSON WARD, individually and as trustee of the Carol Anderson Ward Trust dated February 6, 2002
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?