Poole v. Horn
| ANDRE T. POOLE |
| PAT HORN |
| 25-7588 |
| December 3, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 28, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER FILED. Appellants motion (Docket Entry No. 9) for a second extension of time to file a request for a certificate of appealability (COA) is granted. Any request for a COA is due by June 22, 2026. [Entered: 05/28/2026 01:44 PM]
|
| Filing 9 MOTION to Extend Time to File Motion filed by Appellant Andre T. Poole. [COURT ENTERED FILING to correct DE 8.] [Entered: 05/26/2026 08:02 AM] |
| Filing 8 DEFECTIVE---MOTION to Extend Time to File Brief filed by Appellant Andre T. Poole. [Wrong filing type used, correct entry is DE 9.] [Entered: 05/22/2026 04:38 PM] [Edited: 05/26/2026 08:02 AM] |
|
Filing 7
ORDER FILED. Appellants untimely motion (Docket Entry No. 5) for an extension of time to file a request for a certificate of appealability (COA) is granted. Any request for a COA is due by May 22, 2026. [Entered: 04/29/2026 11:55 AM]
|
| Filing 6 ADDED Counsel for Appellant Paul McCarthy [Entered: 04/28/2026 02:28 PM] |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Extend Time to File Motion filed by Appellant Andre T. Poole. [Entered: 04/22/2026 08:33 AM] |
| Filing 4 Attorney Masha Dabiza as Counsel for Appellee substituted for Attorney Christen E. Somerville. [Entered: 04/21/2026 11:23 AM] |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Masha Dabiza for Appellee Pat Horn replacing Christen E. Somerville. [Entered: 04/21/2026 10:09 AM] |
| Filing 2 COA SCHEDULE NOTICE. Needs a certificate of appealability. Date COA denied in DC: 11/07/2025 [Entered: 12/03/2025 12:29 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 4:20-cv-02283-HSG has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-7588 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 12/03/2025 12:10 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Poole v. Horn | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: ANDRE T. POOLE | |
| Represented By: | Robert Joseph Beles |
| Represented By: | Mr. Paul McCarthy |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: PAT HORN | |
| Represented By: | Christen E. Somerville |
| Represented By: | Masha Dabiza |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
