Trace v. Anaheim Police Department, et al.
| DANIEL TRACE |
| ANAHEIM POLICE DEPARTMENT, Officer HERNANDEZ, Badge No 2844, DOES, 1-100, Officer RANKIN, Badge No 0891 and CITY OF ANAHEIM |
| 25-7617 |
| December 4, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 28, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 MOTION to Accept Late Filing filed by Appellant Daniel Trace. [Entered: 05/28/2026 05:16 PM] |
Filing 15
ORDER FILED. Paper Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief (DE 14) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 5/27/2026, Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 6/26/2026. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 04/28/2026 02:18 PM]
|
| Filing 14 STREAMLINED request for extension of time to file brief for 30 days filed by Appellant Daniel Trace. [Entered: 04/28/2026 02:15 PM] |
| Filing 13 TERMINATED participation of Counsel for Appellant Joseph Bakhos, representing Appellant Daniel Trace. [Entered: 04/07/2026 03:15 PM] |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Withdrawal as Counsel filed by Joseph Bakhos. Counsel withdrawing on behalf of other attorney(s): Yes [Daniel Trace]. Party proceeding without counsel: Yes. 19508 E Calora St, Covina, CA 91724. [Entered: 04/07/2026 12:53 PM] |
|
Filing 11
ORDER FILED. The request (Docket Entry No. 10) to lift the stay of proceedings is granted. The opening brief is due April 27, 2026. The answering brief is due May 27, 2026. The optional reply brief is due 21 days after the answering brief is served. [Entered: 03/24/2026 04:53 PM]
|
| Filing 10 STATUS REPORT filed by Appellant Daniel Trace. [Entered: 03/24/2026 03:07 PM] |
| Filing 9 District Court Order/Notice Received. Granting motion for leave to appeal In Forma Pauperis. [Entered: 03/05/2026 11:20 AM] |
| Filing 8 RELEASED FROM MEDIATION (text only). This case is released from the Mediation Program. [Entered: 02/23/2026 03:42 PM] |
|
Filing 7
ORDER FILED. Appellant has not paid the filing fees or filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis in this court. Appellant did, however, file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal in the district court on December 2, 2025, and that motion remains pending. Proceedings in this appeal are stayed until the district court rules on the motion to proceed in forma pauperis. See Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(1). The clerk will serve a copy of this order on the district court and District Judge Slaughter. [Entered: 02/05/2026 02:42 PM]
|
| Filing 6 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED (text only) - DIAL-IN Mediation Conference Call with counsel for appellant only, 1/28/2026, 11:00 am Pacific Time. Each participant will receive an email with dial-in instructions. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. [Entered: 01/13/2026 10:55 AM] |
| Filing 5 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference, 1/13/2026, 10:00 a.m. PACIFIC Time. See order for instructions and details. [Entered: 12/22/2025 02:25 PM] |
| Filing 4 MEDIATION QUESTIONNAIRE filed by Appellant Daniel Trace. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please email #[email protected] and include the case name and number in the subject line. Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts. [Entered: 12/17/2025 12:39 PM] |
| Filing 3 MEDIATION ORDER (text only): Mediation Questionnaire due (Appellant) 12/17/2025. The court of appeals' records do not indicate that appellant has filed a mediation questionnaire in accordance with Cir. R. 3-4. Appellant shall file a Mediation Questionnaire (#form07.pdf (uscourts.gov)) or dismiss the appeal voluntarily. Information about the mediation program may be found on the court's website: #www.ca9.uscourts.gov/mediation. [Entered: 12/12/2025 03:06 PM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 3/26/2026, Mediation Questionnaire due (Appellant) 12/9/2025, Appeal Transcript Order Due (Appellant) 12/16/2025, Appeal Transcript Due (Appellant) 1/15/2026, Appeal Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 2/24/2026. For appeal no. 25-7617, 8:24-cv-02487-FWS-ADS. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 12/04/2025 10:52 AM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 8:24-cv-02487-FWS-ADS has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-7617 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 12/04/2025 10:36 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
