United States of America v. Martinez-Grandas
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| DERINSON MARTINEZ-GRANDAS and Denison Martinez-Grandas |
| ASIAN AMERICAN COUNCIL OF OREGON |
| 25-7658 |
| December 5, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 24, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 19 ADDED Counsel for Appellee Sarah Barr [Entered: 02/24/2026 01:56 PM] |
| Filing 18 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Sarah Barr for Appellee United States of America. [Entered: 02/24/2026 01:12 PM] |
| Filing 17 MANDATE ISSUED Barry G. SILVERMAN, Richard A. PAEZ, Holly A. THOMAS. The judgment of this Court, entered 1/29/2026, takes effect this date. [Entered: 02/20/2026 09:12 AM] |
| Filing 16 SUBSTITUTED Kelly A. Zusman, for Suzanne Miles. [Entered: 02/19/2026 02:20 PM] |
| Filing 15 CLERK ACTION: Amicus Brief submitted at DE 9 by Asian American Council of Oregon is filed. No paper copies are required. [Entered: 01/29/2026 04:41 PM] |
Filing 14
ORDER FILED. (Barry G. SILVERMAN, Richard A. PAEZ, Holly A. THOMAS) The unopposed motion (Docket Entry No. 9-1) for leave to file an amicus brief in support of appellee is granted. The clerk will file the amicus brief at Docket Entry No. 9-2. In this appeal from the district courts pretrial detention order, we have jurisdiction under 18 U.S.C. 3145(c) and 28 U.S.C. 1291. We review for clear error the district courts factual findings concerning risk of flight. United States v. Townsend, 897 F.2d 989, 994 (9th Cir. 1990). [W]hether the district courts factual determinations justify the pretrial detention order is reviewed de novo. United States v. Hir, 517 F.3d 1081, 1086-87 (9th Cir. 2008). The district court did not clearly err in finding, by a preponderance of the evidence, that appellant poses a risk of flight and that no condition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure the [defendants] appearance. 18 U.S.C. 3142(e); United States v. Motamedi, 767 F.2d 1403, 1407 (9th Cir. 1985). These findings justify the pretrial detention order and we affirm. AFFIRMED. [Entered: 01/29/2026 04:16 PM]
|
| Filing 13 REPLY to Response to 9(a) Memorandum (DE 7) filed by Appellant Derinson Martinez-Grandas. [Entered: 01/16/2026 02:23 PM] |
|
Filing 12
ORDER FILED. The motion (Docket Entry No. 11) for an extension of time to file the reply in support of the memorandum on appeal is granted. The reply is due January 16, 2026. [Entered: 01/15/2026 11:39 AM]
|
| Filing 11 MOTION to Extend Time to File Brief filed by Appellant Derinson Martinez-Grandas. [Entered: 01/13/2026 05:38 PM] |
| Filing 10 ADDED Amicus Curiae - Pending Asian American Council of Oregon. [Entered: 01/06/2026 03:09 PM] |
| Filing 9 AMICUS BRIEF and MOTION for leave to file amicus brief filed by Asian American Council of Oregon. [Entered: 01/06/2026 12:53 PM] |
| Filing 8 DEFECTIVE --- AMICUS BRIEF by government or with consent submitted for filing by Asian American Council of Oregon. (Incorrect entry, see DE 9) [Entered: 01/05/2026 08:02 PM] [Edited: 01/06/2026 03:05 PM] |
| Filing 7 RESPONSE to 9(a) Memorandum (DE 5) filed by Appellee United States of America. [Entered: 01/05/2026 02:02 PM] |
| Filing 6 MOTION to File Document Under Seal and Sealed Document Submitted for Filing filed by Appellant Derinson Martinez-Grandas.--[COURT UPDATE: Separated PDFs attached as of 12/29/2025, REPLACING original attachment] [Entered: 12/23/2025 05:22 PM] [Edited: 12/29/2025 04:01 PM] |
| Filing 5 9(a) Memorandum filed by Appellant Derinson Martinez-Grandas. (Court attached sealed exhibits submitted at DE 6) [Entered: 12/23/2025 04:56 PM] [Edited: 12/29/2025 04:03 PM] |
|
Filing 4
ORDER FILED. The motion (Docket Entry No. 3) for an extension of time to file the memorandum on appeal is granted. The memorandum on appeal is due December 24, 2025. The response to the memorandum on appeal is due January 5, 2026. The optional reply in support of the memorandum on appeal is due seven days after the response is served. [Entered: 12/17/2025 10:38 AM]
|
| Filing 3 MOTION to Extend Time to File Fed. R. App. P. 9(a) Memorandum/ filed by Appellant Derinson Martinez-Grandas. [Entered: 12/16/2025 09:26 AM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. 9(a) Memorandum Due (Appellant) 12/19/2025. Response to Fed. R. App. P. 9(a) memorandum due 10 days after service of the 9(a) memorandum. The optional reply may be filed within 7 days of service of the response. See 9th Cir. R. 9-1.1. Failure of the petitioner to comply with this briefing schedule may result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1 [Entered: 12/05/2025 04:50 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 6:25-cr-00493-MC-2 has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-7658 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 12/05/2025 04:48 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
