Walker v. United States Congress
| STEVEN ERIC WALKER |
| UNITED STATES CONGRESS |
| 25-7714 |
| December 9, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Tax Suits |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 1, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 Document received in this closed case after court order stating that no further filings will be entertained. Order and docket sheet sent to filer. [Entered: 05/01/2026 03:16 PM] |
| Filing 10 MANDATE ISSUED Barry G. SILVERMAN, Milan D. SMITH, Jr., Jacqueline H. NGUYEN. The judgment of this Court, entered 3/2/2026, takes effect this date. [Entered: 04/24/2026 10:05 AM] |
| Filing 9 Document received in this closed case after court order stating that no further filings will be entertained. Order and docket sheet sent to filer. [Entered: 03/06/2026 04:54 PM] |
Filing 8
ORDER FILED. (Barry G. SILVERMAN, Milan D. SMITH, Jr., Jacqueline H. NGUYEN) After considering the response to the courts January 14, 2026 order and the opening brief, we deny the motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Docket Entry No. 3) and dismiss this appeal as frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a), (e)(2). No further filings will be entertained in this closed case. DISMISSED. [Entered: 03/02/2026 11:38 AM]
|
| Filing 7 CLERK ACTION: Opening Brief submitted at DE 6 by Appellant Steven Eric Walker is filed. Original and 0 copies. (Briefing remains stayed, motions pending) [Entered: 01/21/2026 02:40 PM] |
| Filing 6 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Steven Eric Walker. [Entered: 01/21/2026 02:38 PM] |
| Filing 5 RESPONSE to Order - Order to Show Cause (OSC) (DE 4) filed by Appellant Steven Eric Walker. [Entered: 01/20/2026 10:27 AM] |
|
Filing 4
ORDER FILED. It appears that this appeal may be frivolous. If the appeal is frivolous, the court will deny permission to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days, appellant must: (1) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous, OR (2) file a motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). If appellant files a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous, or any other response other than a motion to dismiss, the court will determine whether the appeal is frivolous. If it is frivolous, the appeal will be dismissed. If it is not frivolous, the appeal will proceed. Briefing is stayed. If appellant does not respond to this order, the court may dismiss this appeal without further notice. The clerk will serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, and (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward. [Entered: 01/14/2026 12:52 PM]
|
| Filing 3 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Appellant Steven Eric Walker. [Entered: 12/15/2025 01:49 PM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 1/20/2026. For appeal no. 25-7714, 3:25-cv-02064-JES-BLM. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 12/09/2025 01:56 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 3:25-cv-02064-JES-BLM has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-7714 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 12/09/2025 01:50 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Walker v. United States Congress | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: STEVEN ERIC WALKER | |
| Represented By: | Steven Eric Walker |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: UNITED STATES CONGRESS | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
