Milhouse v. Gulani, et al.
| KAREEM MILHOUSE |
| SAROJ GULANI, Medical Doctor, STEENBERGEN, Assistant Health Service Administrator, JOHN DOE, No. 1, Medical Staff, JANE DOE, individual, Warden LAMMER, individual, Associate Warden TAYLOR, individual, C. GORE, Deputy Captain, Lieutenant GARIBAY, individual, Correctional Officer PITTMAN, individual, Correctional Officer VANDENBERG, individual, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STICKLES, Associate Warden, DOES, Medical Defendants and ARAGONTZ, Associate Warden |
| 25-7855 |
| December 15, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Prisoner-Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 23, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 MANDATE ISSUED Barry G. SILVERMAN, Richard A. PAEZ, Holly A. THOMAS. The judgment of this Court, entered 1/27/2026, takes effect this date. [Entered: 03/23/2026 10:32 AM] |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Miscellaneous Relief filed by Appellant Kareem Milhouse. [Entered: 02/10/2026 08:52 AM] |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel filed by Appellant Kareem Milhouse. [Entered: 02/10/2026 08:50 AM] |
| Filing 4 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Kareem Milhouse. [Entered: 02/09/2026 03:13 PM] |
Filing 3
ORDER FILED. SILVERMAN, PAEZ, and H.A. THOMAS, Circuit Judges. This court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the December 2, 2025 notice of appeal does not challenge a final or immediately appealable order entered by the district court. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; Bird v. Reese, 875 F.2d 256 (9th Cir. 1989) (order) (order denying a motion for default judgment is not a final appealable order). This appeal is therefore dismissed. See 9th Cir. R. 3-6(b) (if court determines it lacks jurisdiction, court may dismiss appeal without notice or further proceedings). DISMISSED. [Entered: 01/27/2026 07:45 AM]
|
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 2/25/2026, Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 1/26/2026. For appeal no. 25-7855, 5:23-cv-01461-JGB-RAO. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 12/15/2025 04:19 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 5:23-cv-01461-JGB-RAO has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-7855 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 12/15/2025 04:16 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
